Partially , but same problem : multiple of rewrites (based on textual analysis), not very old, highly symbolic wanker nonsense , most translators of them are hopeless mumbo-jumbo believers already brainwashed into one certain POV (Hurtak is one example), and the most important thing: older texts with more clarity and less of the ambiguous nonsense exist (mostly Sumerian tablets ).
But yeah, it's still a big puzzle.and we only have fragmented pieces from all over the place and from many different millennia.
I'll use whatever I can, but the more symbolically interpreted stuff that can be translated five million different ways and can be made to "say" anything is not very helpful to putting the puzzle together.
YHWH/Jehovah/the Lord God of Genesis 2. He is not mentioned in Genesis 1, which is weird.
Stop using the rewritten (Masoretic) bible propaganda versions for ANYTHING , you will ger nowhere except running around in circles with that.
Go to the less edited source source texts, Sumerian tablets, oldest Aramaic apocrypha, etc. The Pre-canon texts.
Partially , but same problem : multiple of rewrites (based on textual analysis), not very old, highly symbolic wanker nonsense , most translators of them are hopeless mumbo-jumbo believers already brainwashed into one certain POV (Hurtak is one example), and the most important thing: older texts with more clarity and less of the ambiguous nonsense exist (mostly Sumerian tablets ).
But yeah, it's still a big puzzle.and we only have fragmented pieces from all over the place and from many different millennia.
I'll use whatever I can, but the more symbolically interpreted stuff that can be translated five million different ways and can be made to "say" anything is not very helpful to putting the puzzle together.