It's antisemitic to say that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
(www.informationliberation.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Of course, any criticism of Jews whatsoever is considered antisemitic.
If you can't trust the jew, then how do you trust the jew who translated the Hebrew to English for us?
Jews only tell the truth while teaching their language to goyim? Or jews only tell the truth when it's bad for their image?
...
a) Who suggested the -isms (criticism; judaism; antisemitism) and who consented to it?
b) anti implies a preposition...what exists before (pre) ones position within?
c) does "of course" implies being (life) within course (inception towards death)? How could others distract one from COURSE, noun - "a passing; a motion forward"?
d) CONSIDER, verb - "to fix the mind on"...could considering suggested (affixed) tempt one to ignore perceivable (moving)?
a) Constitution (Verfassung) + Dirt (Schmutz)
b) dirt implies accumulated residue, cleaning it up implies breaking it apart through motion.
What if the constitution of being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)? Does being imply formed residue within a flowing base?
Notice that Verfassung contains Erfassung, hence denoting "to hold onto", while ver- denotes "destruction". What happens if residue (Schmutz) holds onto (Erfassung) destruction (Ver)?
Nice pilpul you got there, Rabbi. Would be a shame if somebody called you out on it.
Ones consent to suggested criticism puts one into a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree)...that's the dispute within self. Others talking about perceivable contradictions are then viewed through the lens of dispute as pilpul aka violent disputations.
Suggestion contradicts perceivable...resisting the former prevents conflicts within latter.
Can I get some dressing to go with that word salad, please?