I would encourage you to read this short correspondence between the office of Nevada U.S. Senator John Ensign and the head of the Independent American Party in Nevada, Christopher Hansen. Hansen persisted in persuading Senator Ensign's office to petition the Congressional Research Service to provide a precise, legal definition of the word "dollar."
As you know, a Federal Reserve Note is self-identified as "legal tender" and a "promissory note." The public may call it "money', but the government calls it "legal tender." As you will discover below, there's a reason for that clever obfuscation and you may be surprised to learn what the court's own reference law dictionaries have to say about the definition of a "dollar" Again and again, the law dictionaries define a dollar as being composed of 100 cents and CANNOT be defined as "PROMISSARY NOTES, bonds, or other evidences of debt". The implications of this last statement should give you much to ponder.
I would encourage you to read this short correspondence between the office of Nevada U.S. Senator John Ensign and the head of the Independent American Party in Nevada, Christopher Hansen. Hansen persisted in persuading Senator Ensign's office to petition the Congressional Research Service to provide a precise, legal definition of the word "dollar."
As you know, a Federal Reserve Note is self-identified as "legal tender" and a "promissory note." The public may call it "money', but the government calls it "legal tender." As you will discover below, there's a reason for that clever obfuscation and you may be surprised to learn what the court's own reference law dictionaries have to say about the definition of a "dollar" Again and again, the law dictionaries define a dollar as being composed of 100 cents and CANNOT be defined as "PROMISSARY NOTES, bonds, or other evidences of debt". The implications of this last statement should give you much to ponder.
https://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/letterdefiningmoney28dec07.shtml