A.rtificial I.mmortality
(odysee.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
a) If one ignores perceivable (natural), while consenting to suggested (artificial); then artifice exist within mortal.
b) MOR'TAL, adjective (Latin mortalis, from mors, death, or morior, to die, that is, to fall) - "subject to death; destined to die".
Being implies as subjection (life) within objection (inception towards death), hence living within the process of dying aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka partial within whole.
Before the natural order appoints death; it offers inception for ones life-sentence.
I think this is the part where there will be longing for death but death will flee
Will implies solid (living) within fluid (dying). The issue is the suggested word "death", which tempts the living will to focus on outcome of life.
Being implies short (life) within long (inception towards death), hence being tempted to ignore short for long, which in return prevents them from growing short within long, hence growing short longer.
Longing forwards tempts one to ignore growing short (life) by resisting long (inception towards death).
Death is just the beginning! There's really no exit, more of an entrance, just a shift in dimensional planes. Edit: transhumanist don't wanna see what's on the other side of the door.
a) BE (being) GIN (Latin gigno; genero; generated)...GIN (inception towards death) generates BE (life).
b) JUST (Latin justus; straight; orderly) implies motion aka natural order.
a) For those (life) within momentum (inception towards death) it goes in (inception) and out (death) of motion.
Exit fluid; entrance solid (inception) and exit solid; entrance fluid (death).
b) if one lacks discernment of self, then one lacks to comprehend being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
An indicator for such lack is use of "more", hence ones choice to ignore all that is perceivable for the suggestion of something "more" than everything.
What's Latin for MORE...MAGIS aka magic.
a) only one possible plane (inception towards death) of existence (life).
b) dimension aka DI (divide) MEN (mind/memory)...ones consent (want or not want) to suggested information divides ones mind/memory within a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
Choosing want attaches oneself to wanted. One needs to resist want, because one (life) cannot hold onto all (inception towards death)....only grow self by resisting.
Bonus: DI-MEN aka DIAMOND..."are forever" + "a girls best friend".
c) SHIFT, verb - "to move; to change place or position; to change its direction" implies as solid within momentum of fluid.
Only within momentum (inception towards death) can one (life) choose left/right; up/down; front/back position, while being moved forwards.
Shifting implies ones adaptation to being moved...not shift of motion; of outside; of whole; of sound; of god; of energy etc.
Sleight of hand: Pole Shift implies a shift of pole aka center within surrounding aka erected growth within circumference of loss.
POLE (Latin palus) also implies PHALLUS, hence the whole erection and circumcision thing.
a) -ist (transhumanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (transhumanism).
b) if one consents to suggested, then one ignores seeing (perceivable reality) for watching (suggested fiction).
Obvious example...whatever a screen shows isn't reality, but fiction. One cannot see reality through a screen, for whatever is shown on screen implies the distorted sight of another suggesting it.
c) "don't" aka doing nothing...that's the suggested screen you choose to watch reality through. Others cannot take it off, only oneself can choose to let go of it.
The origin of nothing implies suggested nihilism. Ignoring perceivable for it, while defending ones consent to suggested implies ones denial aka de-nihil.
Being implies as choice in-between balance (need/want)...choosing to hold onto a suggested side (want or not want) tempts one into conflict with others (want vs not want reasoning).
Want isn't the other side of need...being within motion implies need to resist wanted temptation of being moved towards outcome of being. Choosing need doesn't make want disappear; it grows ones resistance within the temptation thereof.
The process of dying implies temptation (want) for each living resistance (need) within. Simultaneously...the process of dying is needed for the living will/want within to adapt to inspiration.
In short...suggested "other side" tempts one to consent to "another's sight". Resist suggested sides; remain centered choice.