This would also:
- stop the migrant invasion
- end the perpetual welfare state that has turned every large US city into a 3rd world cesspool.
- end the monopolization of the MSM
- end Middle Eastern wars for Israel
- end the jewish practice of looting the financial system
- end the progressive degeneracy that jews have pushed for the last 50 years
- stop the jews from buying our "representatives."
- stop public education from being abused to indoctrinate children
In fact, there is no downside to this.
Oy vey!
I don't give a shit about Palestinians, I just don't want to be involved and what is basically just another one of the pointless wars that happens in the Middle East.
I don't care about them either, but if jews win it means they'll be shipping 2 million Palestinians to our back yards.
Fuck Israel.
One removes lice with pesticide lotions.
I plan to become rich selling JQwell, a topical lotion that eradicates banking usurists and stops them from breeding. Also works if you apply it to Sam Bankman Fried.
We have a serious dual citizen issue. Jews for peace is telling you this. Pay attention.
a) How could a chosen ONE be DUAL (duo; two) without oneself consenting to believe in suggested dualism?
b) Why would one living under e pluribus unum (out of many; one) consent to suggested dualism?
Mind, body, and spirit is my guess for humanity.
But, dual citizens shouldn't be put in the position of choosing one. As far as I can tell they're not representing their constituents.
a) Ignoring one's choice by consenting to whatever another one suggests...that positions one's choice under a chosen one.
b) ignoring self (single one) by consenting to another one, establishes dual (duo, tow) -ism.
There's no two in nature...unless one chooses to count other ones.
c) citizen implies city; center...how could a center be dual? Is ones position as center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable) a dual position?
a) Constituent (essence) of form (life) implies flow (inception towards death)...not any suggested constitution by others.
b) form (life) needs to RE (respond to) PRESENT (given) flow (inception towards death)...not consenting to suggested representatives.
c) F'AR, adjective (Latin porro; Gr. connected with, a way, a passing)...being implies near (life) passing within far (inception towards death).
What's nearer than oneself? What's farther than motion passing through one?
a) What about animal aka anima; animation? Mind/memory responses to moving input. Body is formed within flow. Spirit implies breathing aka impression (inhale) forcing expression (exhale).
b) others suggest GUESS, verb (Latin conjicio) - "conjecture; to form an opinion without certain principles or means of knowledge".
Ones consent to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
tl; dr...before concerning about dual; one needs to discern self and before concerning about a chosen one; one needs to comprehend one's choice.
a) power (potential) cannot be stopped or ended...only ignored.
b) one's ignorance of choice distributes power to chosen ones.
c) want to "remove" tempts one to ignore the need to RE (respond as life) to being MOVED (from inception towards death).
d) US aka UNITED STATES implies ones condition...not the state of others.