Just as with anything right now, there are two sides

a) anything implies each "one" thing.

b) "one" thing doesn't have two sides, unless another one looks at it.

c) left/right aren't two sides; but ones choice within "SIGHT" of balance.

d) suggested SIDE tempts one to ignore perceivable SIGHT.

ordinary people are caught in between

Natural order (inception towards death) doesn't catch those (life) within...it sets each one as "free" will of choice into balance (inception/death).

Once again...inception/death aren't two sides; but ones life within balance (momentum) of oneness (motion).

Every conflict between ordinary people benefits the hidden rulers

Aka every conflict (of reason) between ordinary people (consenting ones) benefits the hidden (ignored) rulers (suggesting ones).

Pakistan and Afghanistan

• Who suggests the sides?
• Who exchanges "and" for "vs" when consenting to either suggested side?
• Who attached differences (Paki + Afghani) to an equal (Stan)?
• What happens to differences (life) within equal (inception towards death)?

I don't think Afghanistan exists anymore. There are the refugees in Pakistan or possibly other places.

And then there are the leftovers from western occupation now under whatever that gang is called. ISIS?

Note: ok i respect the down vote but im not trying to offend the Muslims here.

I don't think Afghanistan even has a legitimate government at this point.

It could be that the ISIS or whatever become the Iran type of leaders. Only in charge on paper, but selling out their national resources to China and other surrounding countries.

It's even worse than Iraq, that barely exists. At least syria has a central leadership and common purpose.