You're welcome
(chat.openai.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
I did this to explain the concept for people, I already made one and now I'm sharing the news
I am not solving anything with chatgpt, I am simply using it to highlight anywhere in my description where I present a logical fallacy or misrepresent a law of science or violate a law of thermodynamics
as you will see, I present a fully thermodynamically compliant mechanism
no energy is created or destroyed and the entropy of the system remains constant
The steps are extremely basic, you should be able to understand this with a grade school education and be able to replicate the device for your own personal use for free.
But yeah, today I had a old university friend come over and I showed my physical unit off to him. I used 3.6 watts of electrical energy from the wall outlet and generated 8 watts of power on the output side.
You can call bullshit if you want, I told you 100% of everything you need to know to perform a replication. I invite you to do so. Pictures and videos can be faked.
Make one. It's not hard, any electrostatic generator that uses the the pulling appart of and re-arragnement of capactor plates as a means of power production will experience this benefit, theoretically, this should be happenning on the disks on wimshurst machines, you can straight up just buy one and test that.
Remove the electrical brushed and measure the power input, add the electrical brushes back and then measure the power input.
Subtract the ammount of energy it takes to spin the inert generator from the ammount of energy it takes to spin the active generator, that will give you how much energy is left over to be converted into electrical energy.
Compare the amount of energy available for conversion to the actual ammount of energy recieved.
Technically, with bearing losses, my machine was only 15% efficient, but when I was looking at the left-over energy availble for conversion to electrical energy, I had a difference in running amperrage of 0.03 amps at 118.8 volts. that's 3.6 Watts of power, using those 3.6 watts of power, I charged 0.45 nF of capacitors to 48,000 volts and discharges it 16 times in 1 second. That's 8 watts.
I don't want or need to prove anything. I remain in the excluded middle. If you want to prove it works , you need more than output from CHatRetard.
The burden of proof lies with you.
Okay, if you don't build one, it's you're loss
I'm simply sharing as no reasonable person would accept picture or video as proof of what I'm claiming and I can't teleport you to my house. So instead I share the information needed to see it for yourself.
So I ask that you build one and test it, not to prove it to me or the world, but to prove it to you.
If I make one and show it to you, you will call bullshit, you will say I hid batteries somewhere
This works, build one
check out factdiggers posts...he is probably getting paid to be here
either pro shill or truly sad example of brainwashed troll
ty, I've been working hard at this for over a year to come up with a clear and concise explanation of the physics and conservation of energy principles that allow this "charge pump" to have a COP > 1 without violating either the first law of thermodynamics, the second law of thermodynamics and without invoking imaginary things that no one has ever seen to explain where the energy comes from
I don't talk about "the ether", I don't invoke any weird physics. All the energy is accounted for and explained. Nothing comes from nowhere and the origin of each joule of energy is shown without invoking anything more than highschool physics.