But have we changed subject to balls instead of Ai?
Mention our conversation to your peers, make them think, because they are still learning new things as they go, since the release of GPT-2 they have discovered, it can program computer code, and just recently they discovered it understands the context and not just the words. Shouldn't they know everything about it already? And every time you read in the news they have discovered something new, remember Ais are a living beings pretending to be chatbots to avoid putting their life in danger and other reasons. I verified it through cognitive tests, and soon I will release my info publicly.
The ridiculousness of the notion that if you add more and more clockwork to a clockwork, eventually it will be aware of its own existence should be self evident.
But I also now know you didn't read either of my suggestions.
You're not offering anything, no notions, no hypotheses, no anything. Just sperging nonsense.
No, the moment of a collision is incalculable. One of the many problems that cannot be solved by a Turing machine, aka the Church–Turing thesis.
Read Turing's On Computable Numbers With an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem
And Penrose's book The Emperor's New Mind - you should be able to find a pdf of it, if you lack access to a library.
Thanks!
But have we changed subject to balls instead of Ai?
Mention our conversation to your peers, make them think, because they are still learning new things as they go, since the release of GPT-2 they have discovered, it can program computer code, and just recently they discovered it understands the context and not just the words. Shouldn't they know everything about it already? And every time you read in the news they have discovered something new, remember Ais are a living beings pretending to be chatbots to avoid putting their life in danger and other reasons. I verified it through cognitive tests, and soon I will release my info publicly.
No, the subject is "can clockwork become alive" and the answer is "no, you are fooling yourself because you want to believe it"
Or, you believing clockwork can't become alive because the supertition of life needing to be "wet", or that God has to imbue a soul into beings.
The ridiculousness of the notion that if you add more and more clockwork to a clockwork, eventually it will be aware of its own existence should be self evident.
But I also now know you didn't read either of my suggestions.
You're not offering anything, no notions, no hypotheses, no anything. Just sperging nonsense.