allowed to openly commit war crimes without consequence.
a) consent by many allows suggestions by few.
b) if many ignore perceivable for suggested, then few can operate openly, while the sight of many remains closed.
c) only consent is given in trust (committed) to suggested; while perceivable is forced upon perception.
d) consenting (want or not want) to suggested sets the minds of the many into conflicts of reason (want vs not want), hence into a state of war. The few rebrand this into peace vs war, while each one of the many ignores being a piece/peace (partial within whole) disturbed (war) by suggestions of others.
e) same trick with law vs crime, which tempts one to ignore being crime (Greek; to separate) within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). As long as the many consent to suggested laws; so long are the few permitted to wield crime.
f) suggested "without" implies being within (perception) outside (perceivable). Ones consent to suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) permits others to redefine without into "not with".
g) action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life)...being implies consequential to cause, while wielding the free will of choice to resist the sequence of dying (loss), while living (growth).
a) consent by many allows suggestions by few.
b) if many ignore perceivable for suggested, then few can operate openly, while the sight of many remains closed.
c) only consent is given in trust (committed) to suggested; while perceivable is forced upon perception.
d) consenting (want or not want) to suggested sets the minds of the many into conflicts of reason (want vs not want), hence into a state of war. The few rebrand this into peace vs war, while each one of the many ignores being a piece/peace (partial within whole) disturbed (war) by suggestions of others.
e) same trick with law vs crime, which tempts one to ignore being crime (Greek; to separate) within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). As long as the many consent to suggested laws; so long are the few permitted to wield crime.
f) suggested "without" implies being within (perception) outside (perceivable). Ones consent to suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) permits others to redefine without into "not with".
g) action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life)...being implies consequential to cause, while wielding the free will of choice to resist the sequence of dying (loss), while living (growth).