All the ways of a man are clean and right in his own eyes. Yet that does not excuse his faults in God's eyes. God understands your thoughts, motives, and the desires of your heart much better than you do. So much the more reason is there for anxious self-examination and testing the conduct by God's word, and, when this has been done to the best of our ability, still to pray for cleansing from faults which have escaped our notice. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.
The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it? "I the LORD search the heart and test the mind, to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds." (Jeremiah 17:9-10 ESV)
EV'ERY, adjective - "each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number"...the only way (inception towards death) sets each one within apart (life) from one another.
Others tempt one with the inversion...aggregation aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka collectivism (many under few) etc.
If highest stands under lowest; then...
Reasoning (want vs not want) implies a conflict over the suggestion by another, hence ignoring self. Can you describe a conflict of reason that isn't about something suggested by others?
Aka good vs evil...reasoning over suggested moralism aka rules of behavior suggested by another, tempting one to remain conflicted (reasoning) with others.
HEART (hollow muscular organ that circulates blood)...how could an inside be hollow if it implies being within an outside?
Yet among the mature we do impart wisdom, although it is not a wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are doomed to pass away. But we impart a secret and hidden wisdom of God, which God decreed before the ages for our glory. None of the rulers of this age understood this, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But, as it is written, "What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man imagined, what God has prepared for those who love him"-- these things God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God. For who knows a person's thoughts except the spirit of that person, which is in him? So also no one comprehends the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might understand the things freely given us by God. And we impart this in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who are spiritual. The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. "For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?" But we have the mind of Christ. (1 Corinthians 2:6-16 ESV)
a) secret (Latin seco; to divide) implies division of whole into partial, hence one being a part within aka im-part.
b) wisdom implies division of WIS (wise; to know; to perceive) and DOM (dominance). What one perceives are moving differences, hence motion dominating the differences within.
c) to hide implies ones choice to ignore everything perceivable offered to each ones perception, by consenting to suggestions of others. Suggested (information) represents a self imposed layer/blanket/cover of ignorance upon perceivable (inspiration).
Ignorance conceals discernment; hence tempting one to withdraw self from perceivable reality into suggested fiction, which in return permits others to exploit that.
Nature doesn't impress durable (to write) it impresses (inception towards death) perishable (life), hence the need to sustain self within wanted temptation.
Others suggest the written to engrave letters upon the consenting one, hence one being tempted to "let" another direct ones being en (in; into) grave (to bury; deposit; inhume) aka burying one under the suggested word aka depositing suggested information within ones consenting mind/memory.
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies adaptation of partial (life) within whole (inception towards death); which reveals the "unseen" motion. Notice that one cannot see ones inception and death, since one exists in-between the momentum of motion, hence motion driving momentum (balance) through center (choice).
Action (motion) impresses itself (through momentum) into reactions...that implies adaption of reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) aka inhaling the impressing (loss), while exhaling as the expression (growth). That implies spirit (to breathe).
Nature doesn't search (finding outcome); since it implies origin of everything coming to be within. Those within tempt each other with suggested progressivism to seek outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
In other words...others suggest "lost" to tempt one to ignore being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...the former tempts one to seek; while the latter inspires one to resist.
Sleight of hand: seek and destroy aka those who seek shall find destruction.
Thinking in words implies ones consent to suggested definitions (fixed) by another, hence permitting others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested definitions at will, while one ignores perceivable inspiration (moving).
In short...knowledge implies moving; thinking about suggested affixes one to others, hence Latin religio - "to bind anew". Those suggesting are permitted to control the confines of ones "thinking" if one consents.
As long as the many consent to think about what the few are suggesting; so long will the few know that the outcome of any thought will be self destructive, and that the entrance of every thought was ignorance.
It's the few who control "think-tanks", while the many willingly drown themselves within.
How could one receive "nothing" without "everything" going through one?
Choosing to "stand-under" binds ones "free" will of choice.
Spirit implies needing to let go within perceivable; while truth implies wanting to hold onto suggested. Truth contradicts spirit; which others brand as "lie" to exploit ones ignorance.
A "liar" simply contradicts the "truth" another holds onto, while ignoring to be within (life) motion (inception towards death). Motion changes every truth into a lie.
Truth (want) vs lie (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need).
a) Nature (inception towards death) cannot be denied by those within (life)...only ignored. Neither does nature require acceptance, since it forces adaptation aka action forcing reactions.
Others suggest nihilism (not; nothing) to distract one, yet it's oneself who consents to a suggested -ism by free will of choice.
b) person (per sonos; by sound)...sound cannot be denied by instruments within, only ignored for "words" shaped out of sound aka for information shaped out of inspiration aka for fiction shaped out of reality aka for something affixed shaped out of everything moving.
Ones consent affixes anothers' suggestion within ones mind/memory.
What enables nothing (not) and how could nothing exist withing towards (to) motion?
a) Being by sound (per sonos) implies sound as that which "just-is" (justice)
b) Others suggest judge aka Latin judex aka JUS (law aka natural order) + DICO (to pronounce; to utter articulately; to speak; to orate; to deliver by suggestion). Why? To distract from a natural order (sound) that doesn't articulate itself, yet enables the choice for those within to ignore real (sound) for artificial (words).
c) those who lack self discernment as being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable) can be tempted with suggested UT'TER, adjective - "situated on the outside or remote from the center", hence being tempted to destabilize self when consenting to what others are uttering.
IN (being within) STRUCO; STRUGO (to destroy) aka being within (life) destruction (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain self by resisting (need) temptations (want).
Others suggest one to seek instructions aka TALMUD (instruction); from Hebrew lamadh - "he learned", which tempts those devoted to learning (students) to understand (stand-under) those who devour (teacher) consent.