So if a nigger wants to fuck your wife and gives you her tits to suck on you would also think it's a great deal?
The Palestinians were just asked to give the very best parts of their lands for some foreign invaders who just arrived by boats. They had every right to think it's a bad deal.
Edit: Add to that even if they accepted everything, the Jews would never stop. They would take it all anyway.
You're right, the deal was bad for Palestinians. But, Resolution 181 was all a setup. The whole thing was arranged a long time before 1947. Probably earlier, but at least 1917 with Arthur Balfour, then British Foreign Secretary, commitment to Lord Rothschild.
I've read for someone who provides good proof that it goes back way even further. He speculates the crusades were actually pushed by Jews/crypto Jews and that the first crusader king of Jerusalem was a crypto Jew.
He also speculates that the whole push for alternate trade routes was instigated by Jews so they can destroy the Ottoman empire. And that the Portuguese/Spanish/Dutch/English colonialism and discoveries were all pushed by them in anticipation of their goal of the creation of the greater Israel project.
To think the Palestinians would have stopped all that by simply being more agreeable is nonsense. But they need to scapegoat them so that it becomes ok to kill them and displace them.
Agreed. First crusader? I have read something similar. I'm not sure if you're referring to Raymond IV of Toulouse. He was a bastard crypto jew, one of the richest men in France at the time and owned the jew Pope. No doubt before preaching the first crusade (1095), Pope Urban II secured assurance of Raymond’s participation.
But, the thing that doesn't make sense to me is a state for jewish people in Palestine? in the desert? surrounded by Arabs? it's not like these people have anything in common with Hebrews, or ancient Semites. Ukraine makes a lot more sense, after all. I'm sure you're aware of the Heavenly Jerusalem project, Igor Berkut has been very public about.
Also, Palestine itself is not desert, only in the south. Palestine has perfect weather year round, probably the best in the world, and up north near the Golan heights they have snow, south Lebanon is also very fertile and lush with rivers (Jews will take it sooner or later).
All Arab leaders work for the Jews, always have been after the collapse of the Ottoman empire. (With very few exceptions such as Nasser, Sadam after the war and Qaddafi)
From a perfect central location, the Jews control all the oil resources, shipping routes along the red sea, the Suez canal and the Nile. It's a perfect location. Whenever they want to expand in the future and have the numbers for it they will just take any region around them. But for now it's about managing the Arabs around them. UAE is their latest henchmen.
So if a nigger wants to fuck your wife and gives you her tits to suck on you would also think it's a great deal?
The Palestinians were just asked to give the very best parts of their lands for some foreign invaders who just arrived by boats. They had every right to think it's a bad deal.
Edit: Add to that even if they accepted everything, the Jews would never stop. They would take it all anyway.
You're right, the deal was bad for Palestinians. But, Resolution 181 was all a setup. The whole thing was arranged a long time before 1947. Probably earlier, but at least 1917 with Arthur Balfour, then British Foreign Secretary, commitment to Lord Rothschild.
I've read for someone who provides good proof that it goes back way even further. He speculates the crusades were actually pushed by Jews/crypto Jews and that the first crusader king of Jerusalem was a crypto Jew.
He also speculates that the whole push for alternate trade routes was instigated by Jews so they can destroy the Ottoman empire. And that the Portuguese/Spanish/Dutch/English colonialism and discoveries were all pushed by them in anticipation of their goal of the creation of the greater Israel project.
To think the Palestinians would have stopped all that by simply being more agreeable is nonsense. But they need to scapegoat them so that it becomes ok to kill them and displace them.
Agreed. First crusader? I have read something similar. I'm not sure if you're referring to Raymond IV of Toulouse. He was a bastard crypto jew, one of the richest men in France at the time and owned the jew Pope. No doubt before preaching the first crusade (1095), Pope Urban II secured assurance of Raymond’s participation.
But, the thing that doesn't make sense to me is a state for jewish people in Palestine? in the desert? surrounded by Arabs? it's not like these people have anything in common with Hebrews, or ancient Semites. Ukraine makes a lot more sense, after all. I'm sure you're aware of the Heavenly Jerusalem project, Igor Berkut has been very public about.
Also, Palestine itself is not desert, only in the south. Palestine has perfect weather year round, probably the best in the world, and up north near the Golan heights they have snow, south Lebanon is also very fertile and lush with rivers (Jews will take it sooner or later).
All Arab leaders work for the Jews, always have been after the collapse of the Ottoman empire. (With very few exceptions such as Nasser, Sadam after the war and Qaddafi)
From a perfect central location, the Jews control all the oil resources, shipping routes along the red sea, the Suez canal and the Nile. It's a perfect location. Whenever they want to expand in the future and have the numbers for it they will just take any region around them. But for now it's about managing the Arabs around them. UAE is their latest henchmen.