You believe the Dome had public facing websites with admin access enabled that would have the ability to shut down the Dome?
That's what makes people believe it's BS, because it's such a basic thing to avoid. It would be the first topic covered in 'Internet Security for Dummies' book.
You believe the Dome had public facing websites with admin access enabled that would have the ability to shut down the Dome?
Regarding this? I don't believe anything besides the provided IP's belonging to Rafael in Haifa. Regarding security systems in general? Sure, seen plenty of them. Flabbergastingly stupid setups overlooking very obvious flaws. And I'm not even that skilled.
I have no problems believing that hackers can take down the Iron Dome. If they've done it in this case, I don't know.
It would be the first topic covered in 'Internet Security for Dummies' book.
Is that a thing or are you just making up stuff to support your claim?
The first IP resolves to RAFAEL ADVANCED DEFENSE SYSTEMS in Haifa, Israel. https://www.whois.com/whois/193.169.71.243
What makes you say it's BS?
You believe the Dome had public facing websites with admin access enabled that would have the ability to shut down the Dome?
That's what makes people believe it's BS, because it's such a basic thing to avoid. It would be the first topic covered in 'Internet Security for Dummies' book.
Regarding this? I don't believe anything besides the provided IP's belonging to Rafael in Haifa. Regarding security systems in general? Sure, seen plenty of them. Flabbergastingly stupid setups overlooking very obvious flaws. And I'm not even that skilled.
I have no problems believing that hackers can take down the Iron Dome. If they've done it in this case, I don't know.
Is that a thing or are you just making up stuff to support your claim?