The goal is to encourage fast food chains to rapidly acquire robots.
Mom and pop restaurants won't be able to compete by staffing at $20/hr. They are having real difficulty now.
By limiting human interactions, the consumer is demoralized by realizing that they are no longer fit to be in society--they simply can't afford to have human interactions.
The same will happen to health care. Lower tier persons will have to interact with AI programs and robots first.
People will seek human interactions but will have to settle for AI humanoids on their screens.
The positive returns on AI interactions diminishes with time. It's like playing the same video game over and over again, forever.
I'm reminded of that scene in "Elysium" where Matt Damon has to go talk to the HR robot or whatever it is. When he gets upset, the robot says, "Take these pills." When he doesn't want to take the pills the robot says, "Do I have to call the robot cops?"
Well, in California they're going to have to pay this robot $20/hour.
Let it never be said that progressivism cannot solve every problem!
The goal is to encourage fast food chains to rapidly acquire robots.
Mom and pop restaurants won't be able to compete by staffing at $20/hr. They are having real difficulty now.
By limiting human interactions, the consumer is demoralized by realizing that they are no longer fit to be in society--they simply can't afford to have human interactions.
The same will happen to health care. Lower tier persons will have to interact with AI programs and robots first.
People will seek human interactions but will have to settle for AI humanoids on their screens.
The positive returns on AI interactions diminishes with time. It's like playing the same video game over and over again, forever.
I'm reminded of that scene in "Elysium" where Matt Damon has to go talk to the HR robot or whatever it is. When he gets upset, the robot says, "Take these pills." When he doesn't want to take the pills the robot says, "Do I have to call the robot cops?"