They're trying. Their ancestors were stupid superstitious desert dwelling psychologically and sexually traumatized shit eaters. Overall they're very smart Sometimes u gotta smack em around but no one's perfect.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I'd not say smart but shrewd.
There's a distinction to be made there.
They like to "bend the rules" to their advantage.
Reminds me of Jamie Gold winning the world series of poker.
Shrewd also has an implicit coldness to it.
And hey, if there are rules, well, fuck 'em. See my post on Hitzig. Same goes for many Harvard researchers. Look at Timothy Leary and "Ram Dass". Regardless of how you feel about psychedelics...illegal experimentation is illegal experimentation.
a) RULE, noun (Latin rego, to make straight)...straight (inception towards death) advances odds (life).
b) the few tempt the many to ignore perceivable rule (straight) for suggested rules (bend). The consent of the many to the suggestions by the few permits the few to bend the rules at will.
c) it's the many who seek advantages by consenting to the suggestions, while the few comprehend that being (life) advanced (inception towards death) requires ones resistance.
In short...jews suggest progressivism to tempt gentiles to ignore resisting.
That's a good one. And the suggestions only get bolder as former ones fail or become stale.
Did you see CNN's viewership numbers?
55,000
LOL
Those who consent to suggested information are upholding it within ones mind/memory...that's where it fails or becomes stale. The weaker the many become; the bolder the few behave.
The 110,000? What's wrong with 220,000 viewers? As if FOX has 440,000 viewers...
Oh, those 55,000 are probably airport terminals, train stations, and people in comas at hospitals.
That'd be my guess.