It's just not very clear. If the "Golden Rule" is selectively enforced, it's not really a rule.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (97)
sorted by:
Lol. You can detail your vague accusation from then here right now if you like. No matter what you say, you wont be banned for it.
It was never my intention to ban you over this. I was challenging you to explain your vague and bogus accusation, which you never did and still haven't.
Ok, just admit that you openly condone the HARASSING of other users. It's just a handful of people that do it. You could drop them at the blink of an eye.
But you won't.
Correct?
I don't condone actual harassment, but people's level of sensitivity online varies wildly. Some people can't take even one comment of disagreement, and call it harassment and report it.
And then some people can be told to kill themselves many times over (online) and never consider it harassment nor report the comment. "Water off a duck's back" as they say.
I do tend towards the latter type rather than the former. I'm old school, and I tend to think the former category of ultra sensitives need to learn to ignore and let go of negative comments they encounter online more. I'm not into creating a safe space just for them.
Look at TallestSkil go!
What a legit user!
And a lying mod that protects him.
Yet you banned allmodsarefags for far less.
People besides me can see the discrepancies, you know.
It's VERY obvious.
So it's about me not banning the users you want banned, and banning the users you don't want banned. That's a different story to the whole shill protector accusation.
I don't remember banning allmodsarefags, or for what. From the user name I can imagine. I don't deny I did it. After I send this comment I'll try and look it up.
However, I would remember if that user had appealed their ban, or another user had asked for them to be unbanned because they felt they were wrongfully banned. I would remember because that happens so rarely. In fact, tallestskil's case is the only example I can think of, and I did unban him when someone else (not an alt of his) requested he be given another chance. It's that simple.
No one ever appeals. Usually the appeal message is just the user calling me nigger or faggot or telling me to kill myself. But if they changed their mind and actually appealed I would probably grant it. We all lose are heads sometimes.
u/allmodsarefags
LOL
What is funny?
I just said a specific user.
I no longer trust you, sorry.
You lied AGAIN and said that I tried to have you removed as mod.
You will just keep lying.
Funny how you always manage to avoid giving any detail to your accusation.
I stand by what I said, you wont be banned for giving a full and detailed description of your grievance with me. I want to hear it. Perhaps I might even see your point of view. Right now, I can't. So far as I am aware, I never did what you accused me off in that comment about banning people for talking about specific shills or whatever. It sounded very made up and malicious.
I don't know who you think are shills, I personally don't hypothesize about shills generally, nor do I have a favorites list.
My intention is to keep all genuine users who want to be here here, and get rid of spammers and people who come to this forum for the express reason of hatred of our regular users and of conspiracy theorizing in general.
You condone Tallestskil's behavior.
That's not vague.