sound of freedom gets funded by mexican billionaire carlos slim who also gave $200 million USD to clinton foundation initiatives.
q paytriotards fight the deepstate by going to see the movie.
the deepstate can't stop the movie for some reason, but they can turn off the airconditioning in some movie locations for some reason.
the same week that channel 4 bbc have a takedown of russell brand, vice puts out an investigation of ballard, though it was known he had resigned back in july.
not sure what to make of this, is this to make red team supporters look like sex pests, and also get red team enthusiasts to support sex predators.
not sure what to think of this.
brand always seemed to be obvious controlled opposition.
both brand and sound of freedom felt astroturfed.
did brand go off-script, or is it controlled humiliation ritual to make the false saviors the false sacrificial goats.
a) the internal organ within external -tion (action) implies ones reaction.
b) choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested organizations implies misuse (abuse) of ones reacting choice.
c) sleight of hand...serve (inception towards death) to protect (life) aka serve loss to protect growth. How does one serve (render habitual obedience to) loss? By resisting it, and resisting fertilizes ones resistance (growth).
Protecting others implies sacrificing self; which in return hurts others.
Suggesting a brand implies a burned offering; consenting to a suggested brand implies putting the heat on self, while permitting a controlled burn by others.
Being implies free (choice) within dom (balance/momentum) of sound (entire/motion).