Venture capital, how do they manage to keep the scams going?
Are these venture funds really profitable? I hardly doubt it. I know of many who really do not have any sound business models yet they keep the scam going, with rounds of investments.
From what I was able to put together at the moment:
-Venture capitalism is about directing innovation into the direction Jewish Israelis desire. (if you do what they like to do, such as surveillance, vaccines etc.. you get the money, but if you want clean energy, cancer cure, etc.. you won't get the money)
-Control monopolies, with venture capitalism they make sure whatever new market dominating businesses are all under their control.
-Circular investments and directing the money to their other investments and companies. A lot of these entrepreneurs/start ups end up doing "rapid growth" which means giving a lot of money to Google/Meta/etc.. to put up advertisements.
But still, seeing all these failed business, or what should be a failed business like Uber/Tesla etc.. still going and seeing those major investment funds like Sequoia Capital making profits does not add up.
How do they fidget the numbers, who pays the tap eventually for all of these scams or maybe I am missing something. Anyone with any info? Thx.
It's more about a compelling story with a huge profit potential than anything to do with a Jewish direction. It could be something boring as heck but very innovative and scalable. Like Airbnb was VC backed. Nothing nefariously Jewish about it, just a good idea that can go viral and did.
Not dismissing all the problems you're alluding to, but the market has really been open to anyone who has a good sales pitch + execution of an idea.
On the surface it looks like that and in many ways you are correct, but I mean did you see the amount of money being poured in!!
What is Uber or Airbnb really? It's just an app/website. Yeah it's a great idea but is it worth that much? And was it really that original? Also if you look into businesses like Amazon, Uber, etc.. you find that they are actually losing money or only at a very later stage started to make minuscule profits so the business model doesn't add up.
Yeah the whole growth first profits later approach is a big problem. But investors are greedy and they all want the next Google or Facebook. And having interest rates so low for so long only helped this along.
Though I agree sometimes it is purely based on connections, maybe a company is sold out and freemasonic from the beginning (like Google and Facebook). Google and Facebook have all sorts of masonic symbolism. But I think there are also profits made by people who just go viral, as it were, using VC funding only, then sell off at a high valuation without having made a sustainable business model whatsoever. Whatsapp come to mind. They just focus on customer acquisition on a massive scale, then they sell out to a company who wants that huge userbase. Or they IPO and start selling off stock.