Did Catholicism Create Islam?
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Rome does not define Christianity. The Bible defines what Christianity is. The Bible also clearly identifies and calls out what Rome is. It gives a specific timeline in its prophecies that perfectly predict the ministry of Christ, the various kingdoms that rule earth through history, and even the reign of the Catholic Church in the dark ages. It even identifies America. If you really know what the Bible actually says, you could tell me what time period we are in according to scripture and where it is paralleled in scripture. Who is America in the Bible? What role will it play? If you’ve been studying scripture your whole life and know the symbolism so well, you should be able to answer these critical questions.
Again, you are letting manmade symbolism direct your thought and not the Bible. You aren’t even referencing the symbolism of the mixed and unmixed wine correctly.
For someone who is reluctant to embrace false teachings, you certainly seem to enjoy believing in gnostic fanfiction. I reluctantly came to Christianity because I approached the subject with a completely open mind and gave each version of the story it’s own careful consideration. Coming to God essentially meant that I had to acknowledge that I had been studying lies for years.
You might want to tell the martyrs that Rome didn't attempt to define Christianity. It would be news to them.
I made a mixing of wine analogy. I didn't refer to the biblical example. But this is exactly what accepting literalist teachings as 'scripture' and therefore infallible is doing. (mixing in poor wine).
Saving Israel for last means pulling the literalist (satanic) snake from the tree yet agian. From belief in false teachings to knowledge of deep truths.
No the bible doesn't identify America.
You can't prove a thing by itself. You can't prove or disprove by 'belief' in something. I'm not attempting to do either. You are.
Go ahead and show me some example of my 'believing in gnostic fanfiction'.
I'll wait.
If you mean belief in the existence in a historic 'Judaic' gnostic movement, I'd be a fool not to. I'd be a fool, after studying it, not to see that it was that movement that brought the messianic message, and that it was their so-called messiah that was co-opted by Flavian Rome and perpetrated by the later so-called church it created through misrepresentation of dogmatic principles.
I didn't reluctantly come to the truth as i understand it. I sought it with every fiber of my being.
I don't 'identify' as gnostic, agnostic or a 'believer'. I seek truth and leave name calling to lesser individuals.
This isn't about me in any case, and it isn't about preaching dogma. You hoist theosophists up as proof of your search and then cast it aside, saying there was nothing there.
I found something there. The things that attract them and fool them in it. I see the half that is correct and the parts that their methods won't allow to be seen. Because two are taken up on a high place, but only one looks at the source.
You show your position whether you know it or not. And your style is as offensive as it is sophomoric.
If you’re going to use a biblical analogy, it needs to parallel the biblical example. Making an analogy that doesn’t harken to the source material isn’t a valid analogy. If it was, you could just make symbols mean whatever you want with no basis and then you have no foundation to base your beliefs on. You become a victim to whomever can make the most correct sounding argument instead of being able to verify their positions with discernment.
The fact that you are trying to prophecy using non-biblical symbols and believe in the demiurge narrative is proof in itself that you believe in gnostic fanfiction. You tell me that you’ve found truth in lies. Truth mixed with lies is still a lie and it has nothing to do with the way God gives information. God doesn’t occult the truth. The Bible is a complete work and you are able to understand the story and it’s symbols using just its texts. There are no deep, hidden truths in Christianity because God does nothing in secret. If you think I’m an orthodox Christian, I’m not.
And again, Catholicism doesn’t define Christianity in the same way the Pharisees didn’t define it. God defines His faith and the truth therein, not man or the actions of man. You are pointing to religions practiced by deceived men and are trying to say that it’s Christianity.
It doesn’t matter what you “identify” as. If you obey the teachings and edicts of someone, you belong to them. At the end, there is no middle ground, only the two sides. Satan has created what will be a confederacy of belief systems that all supposedly point to the direction of truth when it’s all a lie. There is only one path you can walk and it’s a very narrow one. It shares nothing with the other things you are studying. The Bible goes out of its way, many times, to warn that the whole world gets deceived with the exception of a small remnant that keep the faith against tremendous persecution in the end. You probably wouldn’t even believe me if I told you what the mark of the beast will end up being.
The Bible absolutely identifies America if you understand biblical symbolism and the timeline given. America is the second beast of revelation (the beast that comes out of the earth) that will eventually give power back to the first beast which is the Papacy (the beast that comes out of the sea). The final apostasy that takes over the planet, and eventually rolls out the mark of the beast, is going to start in America before spreading out over the world. My suspicion is that it will be within the decade at the rate things are going. We are currently in a period of time referred to as the hour of judgement. This is a probationary period that finds its parallel in genesis, in which 120 years passed after God declared He would destroy the earth and the flood actually came. This probationary period will continue until just after the mark gets rolled out and enforced, then the plagues will come. During this period, the final call to God’s people to come out of Babylon must spread over the world so that everyone can make their decision as to whom they will serve.
As for proof, biblical prophecy absolutely can be proven. The prophecies in Daniel give the starting date and they perfectly predict the ministry of Christ and the rule of the papacy if you just work it out.
Divine inspiration doesn’t reign in the end, Christ does. He comes back and pretty much destroys the planet. Modern Israel and the biblical Israel have nothing to do with each other. The country of Israel could be destroyed tomorrow and it wouldn’t affect biblical prophecy at all. They aren’t the Jews Jesus is talking about in Revelation. The fact that so many people of these sites rant and rave about the modern Jews like they’re the “big bad” goes to show their shallow roots in scripture.
Where the heck did you get this nonsense that the chans and voat had some pivotal role in prophetic events? The Bible or some post on the internet? What spiritual fruits does 4chan yield?
What's the general test of a prophecy? It happened.
I don't think this prophecy word is as you would have it.
People who 'preach' instead of teach never seem to climb high enough on the cliff before turning around and pretending to be the example. It shows in their attempts to send everyone to their misconceived Hell rather that come to an understanding.
Your destroyer God needs to get a room with Kali......but you wouldn't understand what that mean because of your shallow roots in historic world scripture.
If the Roman Jesus returns to destroy in his name, he's playing the role of Kali the destroyer and his role as Christ of the living is negated. Blame Flavian theology twistings.
It allows lesser men to pretend to teach the learned with false platitudes. The gnostics warned the literalist Romans against politicizing religion by creating an anthropromorphic substitute to rule the world by forcing them into a 'universal' aka 'Catholic' dogma about the new man-god. A book had to be backwritten to confirm. Enter the Flavians, exit the true meaning of chrism and the christ.
You've made your choice. The end won't be for everyone.
Yes, I’ve studied the eastern religions and compared them to the western religions. At the end of the day, every one of them worships Lucifer. You can plainly see if you recognize the symbolism and look at their fundamental theologies.
You do know that Jesus is one of the most well documented people on the planet correct? Where is your evidence that the Bible was just back written by the flavians?
When it comes to prophecy, what do you think is going to happen, according to your sources?
Are you insinuating that I’m trying to send people to hell? Wake up dude. If you think the second coming is just an evil, vindictive act of a destroyer God then you are hilariously blind to why it’s going to happen and why that’s ultimately the best possible outcome. You understand so little of the Bible it’s baffling. Just as inverted as the gnostic teachings you ascribe to. Gnosticism worships Lucifer, it’s not some secret truth. That secret knowledge you espouse is just made up fan fiction by fallen angels meant to entice people with itching ears.
The gnostics and the Roman Catholics worship the same thing just with different verbiage.