Either you need to have some standards, or bad accounts have a whole lot of alts. There's a garbage self promotion with 12 up votes. Have our standards fallen so low?!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
What if you've seen the video elsewhere? Or, what if you are watching it? That's too small a number to make such conclusions with, on high-latency eventual-consistency distributed systems.
If you want to take a look at my comments, you can read the thread from beginning to end, and decide for yourself. However, they picked a topic I enjoy. I went out of my way to explain what I originally mistook for misunderstanding. The Bible can be confusing.
The final straw was they cited Irish origins of civilizations website. I referred them to Michael Tsarion, so that is good right? But the link was intentionally damaged. Then when I told them I knew it was MT's site they changed the link to a different site without changing the words about the link. They refuse to learn the information I took the time to present. ( this site isn't easy on the phone. I had to copy the info, paste it in a text msg, and then copy /paste that into my comment here. To do all that is probably made me so done) They cite random shitty blogs that don't cite, and they're arguing due to their faith ( pretty demeaningly to me) rather than the cited facts. On a topic I've spent years enjoying. There is even a moment they told me, " it's just a conspiracy site" as if wrong information belongs here because we hold no value.
They further prove they're beyond stupid for telling me I both only use one source on a topic at the same time telling me not to use mainstream books I referenced on the very same topic.
An absolute disaster of scholarly work. Up voted?! No way. We have too many people here that have taught me too much.