The above example shows the weaponization of majority (black) against minority (white). Ask yourself why jews can utilize majority against minority; while being less than the minority?
replacement
Response (re) to position (place) of mind/memory (ment)...why do the so called jews utilize maximum number of bodies (black) vs minimum number of bodies (white), when it's about "mind/memory"?
weaponization
WEAPON (instrument of offense)
IZE (verb denoting doing of noun)
ATION (action)
a) action generates reactions; sound generates instruments...ones "weapon of choice" represents reacting instrument within enacting sound.
b) VERB (denotes action) doesn't generate NOUN (name; word that denotes a thing)...others utilize their weapon of choice to suggest nouns; names; brands; idols; fiction etc. which they do VERBALLY (speech aka spell-craft).
You should look into South Africa's early history. It was a desolate waste that White settlers turned into a prosperous nation. And then the bantu hordes came.
a) waste (inception towards death) turned into prosperous (life)...those alive are being tricked to view their surrounding as waste instead of opportunity.
b) others suggest "settling down" to distract from being (life) dissolved (inception towards death) within; which implies ones need of resistance.
c) whatever one builds tempts others to want it. One needs to resist want, hence need to let go over want to hold onto.
For example...giving a fox access to ones chicken coop shapes the fox into a weaker predator, while protecting ones coop inspires a predator to adapt, hence growing more efficient.
d) nation implies "a people"...not their position. Why are the "white" people so weak? Because they believe in white nations; in white communities; in white societies...in other words...they were tricked to attach themselves to suggested umbrellas (national-ism; commune-ism and social-ism).
e) what if he-brew his-story and jew fell for it? The many are being tricked to hold onto a suggested "history" that only a few define; redefine and contradict at will, hence writing the narratives as they go, while the many follow along stumbling over themselves.
f) bantu aka BA (plural prefix) NTU (person)...person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies singular aka from whole (sound) into partials (instruments).
Others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self. It ain't "we the people"; it's each one within all.
The above example shows the weaponization of majority (black) against minority (white). Ask yourself why jews can utilize majority against minority; while being less than the minority?
Response (re) to position (place) of mind/memory (ment)...why do the so called jews utilize maximum number of bodies (black) vs minimum number of bodies (white), when it's about "mind/memory"?
a) action generates reactions; sound generates instruments...ones "weapon of choice" represents reacting instrument within enacting sound.
b) VERB (denotes action) doesn't generate NOUN (name; word that denotes a thing)...others utilize their weapon of choice to suggest nouns; names; brands; idols; fiction etc. which they do VERBALLY (speech aka spell-craft).
You should look into South Africa's early history. It was a desolate waste that White settlers turned into a prosperous nation. And then the bantu hordes came.
a) waste (inception towards death) turned into prosperous (life)...those alive are being tricked to view their surrounding as waste instead of opportunity.
b) others suggest "settling down" to distract from being (life) dissolved (inception towards death) within; which implies ones need of resistance.
c) whatever one builds tempts others to want it. One needs to resist want, hence need to let go over want to hold onto.
For example...giving a fox access to ones chicken coop shapes the fox into a weaker predator, while protecting ones coop inspires a predator to adapt, hence growing more efficient.
d) nation implies "a people"...not their position. Why are the "white" people so weak? Because they believe in white nations; in white communities; in white societies...in other words...they were tricked to attach themselves to suggested umbrellas (national-ism; commune-ism and social-ism).
e) what if he-brew his-story and jew fell for it? The many are being tricked to hold onto a suggested "history" that only a few define; redefine and contradict at will, hence writing the narratives as they go, while the many follow along stumbling over themselves.
f) bantu aka BA (plural prefix) NTU (person)...person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies singular aka from whole (sound) into partials (instruments).
Others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self. It ain't "we the people"; it's each one within all.