No. It's a narrative. The simplest narrative ever used.
What's an antichrist everything unchristian or ungodly. Simple ain't it.
The way battle is conducted represents the 4 horseman. It's the same paradigm. The horses follow each other, heralding each other, God's army eventually wins, it was reminiscent of seige warfare. But it is a narrative doomed to repeat itself. It specifically recollects from Babylon.
There is nothing more to it. It can be woven into many events. Because it simply connects as prophesied when it's simple repetition. It can be orchestrated or adopted into practice.
Nope. The only realism is realising it was a paradigm for seige warfare destined to repeat itself every seige against those who considered themselves godly. Similarly applied to warfare. It isn't prophetic just nuance and surrealism. It could've even been taken out of the Bhagavad Gita, Summerian tablets, originally. Because it repeats itself seamlessly. It reworded with simple nuance.
Until it could've been talking about the seige of Constantinople. Babylon. The destruction of Jerusalem. Rome. Countless times over.
An antichrist was everybody heathen. The head of those was Satan himself. Or the antichrist.
The events causing warfare were the horsemen enacting the beseiged.
No. It's a narrative. The simplest narrative ever used.
What's an antichrist everything unchristian or ungodly. Simple ain't it.
The way battle is conducted represents the 4 horseman. It's the same paradigm. The horses follow each other, heralding each other, God's army eventually wins, it was reminiscent of seige warfare. But it is a narrative doomed to repeat itself. It specifically recollects from Babylon.
There is nothing more to it. It can be woven into many events. Because it simply connects as prophesied when it's simple repetition. It can be orchestrated or adopted into practice.
There ain't no other magic to it.
Nope. The only realism is realising it was a paradigm for seige warfare destined to repeat itself every seige against those who considered themselves godly. Similarly applied to warfare. It isn't prophetic just nuance and surrealism. It could've even been taken out of the Bhagavad Gita, Summerian tablets, originally. Because it repeats itself seamlessly. It reworded with simple nuance.
Until it could've been talking about the seige of Constantinople. Babylon. The destruction of Jerusalem. Rome. Countless times over.
An antichrist was everybody heathen. The head of those was Satan himself. Or the antichrist.
The events causing warfare were the horsemen enacting the beseiged.