Got any sauce for your interpretation? It's 180 degrees opposite of how the author wrote that line.

Also, I think some of the others are anti-God and anti-humanity.

#1 and #2 are at odds with the Bible in Genesis 1:28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”

#3 is at odds with Genesis 11:9 That is why it was called Babel—because there the Lord confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord scattered them over the face of the whole earth.

#4 denies the authority of God (faith) over everything else, and wants to subject faith in God to "tempered reason" which is subjective -- according to what standard?

#5 sounds good.

#6 can be good but a world court is also a risk for a one world government which is bad.

#7 sounds reasonable.

#8 social duties in small communities enforced by fathers with tight nuclear families are a good thing. "Social duties" enforced by governments are a bad thing.

#9 unclear what "harmony with the infinite" means, but probably the author's idea of what should be worshipped instead of God.

#10 See Genesis 1:28 again.