Brah, the evidence is so overwhelming that they knew it didn't work, and it was dangerous...aaaaaand pushed it anyway. Given that, why endanger those closest to you?
If you come with Occam's Razor thinking "I hear hoofbeats, so it's horses not zebras" but it's actually not hoofbeats but some other animal, then Occam's Razor gives you nothing (which is exactly where you're at).
I asked you, bro. You’re the one who seems to think that Jews didn’t suffer vaccine injury, so not sure why you’re suddenly reluctant to hypothesize. Seems like you have a vivid imagination.
Don't be a dope. See the OP, and how I responded in such as way that I believe it's a plausible theory, given the example of Gavin Newsome, but came to no firm conclusions. You're wandering around it left field now.
Brah, the evidence is so overwhelming that they knew it didn't work, and it was dangerous...aaaaaand pushed it anyway. Given that, why endanger those closest to you?
If you come with Occam's Razor thinking "I hear hoofbeats, so it's horses not zebras" but it's actually not hoofbeats but some other animal, then Occam's Razor gives you nothing (which is exactly where you're at).
Okay, so if they knew that it didn’t work and that “it was dangerous” then tell me: why did they endanger those closest to them? What’s your theory?
What what the theory the OP proposed?
I asked you, bro. You’re the one who seems to think that Jews didn’t suffer vaccine injury, so not sure why you’re suddenly reluctant to hypothesize. Seems like you have a vivid imagination.
Don't be a dope. See the OP, and how I responded in such as way that I believe it's a plausible theory, given the example of Gavin Newsome, but came to no firm conclusions. You're wandering around it left field now.