I've concluded that, whatever his other faults and crimes, while J. Edgar was certainly compromised on the investigation but he was not "in" on the assassination of JFK.
For example. there's an FBI memo where Hoover has heard that someone is going around New Orleans passing themselves off with the same name as an FBI informant--Lee Oswald--and he wants someone to check into it. This was probably an artifact of "Harvey and Lee" running around. If Hoover wasn't even aware of the situation at that level, how deep could he have been?
As for Joseph Farrell, I've also concluded that he's a disinformation agent. Ever notice that he seems to be a widely knowledgeable person with a tremendous amount to say about many subjects from a deeply informed viewpoint, but that it never actually leads anywhere? That's a pretty good formula for constructing a disinformation agent, isn't it?
I've concluded that, whatever his other faults and crimes, while J. Edgar was certainly compromised on the investigation but he was not "in" on the assassination of JFK.
For example. there's an FBI memo where Hoover has heard that someone is going around New Orleans passing themselves off with the same name as an FBI informant--Lee Oswald--and he wants someone to check into it. This was probably an artifact of "Harvey and Lee" running around. If Hoover wasn't even aware of the situation at that level, how deep could he have been?
As for Joseph Farrell, I've also concluded that he's a disinformation agent. Ever notice that he seems to be a widely knowledgeable person with a tremendous amount to say about many subjects from a deeply informed viewpoint, but that it never actually leads anywhere? That's a pretty good formula for constructing a disinformation agent, isn't it?