There was a news article last week, I think, that said some scientists had discovered as much as 1/3 of the covid vaxx given out in Europe was placebo. I also recall the European Medicines agency in their leaked emails complained to Pfizer, before they granted emergency auth, that the samples provided to them didn't contain as much of the active agent as Pfizer had specified they would; and in reply the CEO of Pfizer just ignored their concerns and told them to get the finger out and authorize it to save the world.
Just 2 examples of how it is not as clear cut as "got the shot, going to get sick/die". Perhaps it's done so to give themselves plausible deniability if something goes wrong with the shots - "well this entire group of people got the shots and nothing happened to them, so the shots can't be to blame". That argument certainly sways less skeptical people quite easily, and those who got multiple shots and don't want to think too deeply about all this.
However, that does NOT mean that the "yellow batch" was intentional placebo (with 100% certainty).
It does mean however, when combined with the data from Paul Ehrlrich Institute (Germany) that the officials knew WHICH batches were super-hot and which were NOT.
The reasons for this non-random variability are still unknown, but if it was pure manufacturing standards laxness, then the variability would not have been as clustered as it ended up being.
So, ~33% being 100% placebo is still unsure (as even that batch had some adverse effects beyond mere injection site pain), but what is know THAT THEY FUCKING KNEW ALL ALONG, and still mass-injected.
There was a news article last week, I think, that said some scientists had discovered as much as 1/3 of the covid vaxx given out in Europe was placebo. I also recall the European Medicines agency in their leaked emails complained to Pfizer, before they granted emergency auth, that the samples provided to them didn't contain as much of the active agent as Pfizer had specified they would; and in reply the CEO of Pfizer just ignored their concerns and told them to get the finger out and authorize it to save the world.
Just 2 examples of how it is not as clear cut as "got the shot, going to get sick/die". Perhaps it's done so to give themselves plausible deniability if something goes wrong with the shots - "well this entire group of people got the shots and nothing happened to them, so the shots can't be to blame". That argument certainly sways less skeptical people quite easily, and those who got multiple shots and don't want to think too deeply about all this.
That news article was based on this study by Shcmeling et al:
Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36997290/
Out of which came this graph:
https://files.catbox.moe/w810kz.png
Which was based on the work by Craig Paardekooper on the site HowBad.info:
https://www.howbad.info/
Who collaborated with above paper authors and Sasha Latypova, and others, as detailed in Latypova's substack:
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/was-it-30-placebo
However, that does NOT mean that the "yellow batch" was intentional placebo (with 100% certainty).
It does mean however, when combined with the data from Paul Ehrlrich Institute (Germany) that the officials knew WHICH batches were super-hot and which were NOT.
The reasons for this non-random variability are still unknown, but if it was pure manufacturing standards laxness, then the variability would not have been as clustered as it ended up being.
So, ~33% being 100% placebo is still unsure (as even that batch had some adverse effects beyond mere injection site pain), but what is know THAT THEY FUCKING KNEW ALL ALONG, and still mass-injected.