since it's in the news again...
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
None of this presents a compelling argument, either way.
Your best angle would be to point out that the plain reading of text usually has no bearing on the interpretation of law. You'd then need to present case law and try to establish your point.
Actually, it's a group of people organized as a single entity, the definition of a corporation.
It can sue and be sued.
No case law needed.
Your arrogance is why you'll never make a point that's even reasonable.
Case law is always needed. You can't have words just say what they mean, not in the US legal system. You can claim whatever you want but it will always be without foundation.
Case law is not always needed.
It's called basic logic, not trying a case.
You didn't respond to what I said, instead preferring to insult me.
It can sue and be sued as a single entity.
And yes, I can claim what I want, with plenty of foundation. The US is a corporation meant to squeeze the most profit out of their slaves, I mean workers.
But go ahead, you can have fun digging through case law if you want. Who gives a shit about case law in a two-tier legal system? Wanna know why I got out of law?
LOL
You make the assertion. You have nothing to back it up with. Just a naked assertion.
US Corporation means a corporation that is a “domestic corporation” within the meaning of the U.S. Tax Code (or any Subsidiary of such corporation that is itself a “domestic corporation” within the meaning of the U.S. Tax Code.
Your claim doesn't fit. Who's going to tax the US?