I’m being honest here. I wouldn’t put it past Jews to create bombs that can eradicate whole cities and make the land infertile because they’re Jews but are nukes actually real? If so why haven’t they been used since Nagasaki?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
the science behind the way nuclear bombs function doesn't add up. Read "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax" by Akio Nakatani. It's a shortish book and it's available as a free pdf on Libgen and Internet Archive. It details why Nuclear bombs are ridiculous. NOT nuclear energy, that's very real.
Then there's another book "Hiroshima Revisited: The evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by fire bombing and mustard gas" where the argument is made that the evidence for post nuclear detonation didn't exist in those places. The after effects, on the land and on the injured and dead people, are more realistically attributable to fire bombing (napalm) and mustard gas.
Then there are various videos on the internet exploring the various nuclear detonations propaganda films we are familiar with. They are propaganda films, yet we accept them as genuine without skepticism for some reason. Cast a skeptical eye on them and many flaws become apparent. The most ridiculous is the hilarious South African one. It's so obviously fake. They never had Nukes, but officially we are told they did - no nuclear power denied their claim.
You're a retarded troll.