Amazon Alexa Locks "Racist" Owner Out of Smart Home
(odysee.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Nobody should have racist tech. The tech is racist. It has excluded somebody in prejudice over a rant? That's racism.
TFW, the person who was locked out was of the same race as the delivery person and nothing racist was actually said.
The tech is racist. It has no grounds to exclude. That's illegal. It was prejudice to what was said. It is in no lawful position to make that judgement. Racism. Yes.
Racism is excluding somebody in prejudice. Prejudice towards race normally.
However it is nonsensical this word racism, because everybody is prejudice based on preference. It leads to discrimination here topically. Illegally. The tech is racist. It had no right.
a) reality implies all inclusive...no exclusions.
b) RACE (Latin raddix; radius; radiate; ray) implies growth from center (inward) towards surrounding (outward)...ones consent to a suggested -ism by another represses that growth.
c) if life exits in-between inception towards death motion, then death is predefined for life...motion implies prejudice to everything within.
d) somebody aka SOME, adjective - "noting a certain quantity of a thing, but indeterminate" + INDETERM'INATE, adjective - "not determinate; not settled or fixed; not definite; uncertain"...certainty (inception towards death) implies prejudice to everything uncertain (life).
a) ...was suggested by a third party; while both consenting parts (racists and non-racists) are in conflict (reasoning) against each other about it.
b) consenting to any -ISM (distinctive doctrine, theory, or practice) tempts one to ignore being distinct (partial) within indistinct (whole).
c)...does not exist within perceivable sound unless shaped into a suggestible word.