If this comes as news, I hope that at least at this point it doesn't come as a surprise. The paper is by disinfo agent Miles Mathis, so all the usual caveats apply.
A couple of little factoids to add to the material in the paper are that Judy Clarke (of fake OJ trial fame) served as his lawyer, and Merrick Garland (of corrupt DOJ fame) oversaw the Unabom case as Deputy AG. What a coincidence!
The problem with Mathis is that with him almost every event of significance to humanity that he has examined is a highly orchestrated psyop done with the utmost care and precision. And every picture he examines has been doctored, though he's not sure how, but only very few talented people like him can tell. Even obscure pictures, that hardly anyone has even seen, the doctoring of which would have no effect on human history whatsoever. Masterfully doctored.
When he's right, he's right. But when he's wrong he just he can't admit it. Or he is just writing fiction for the hell of it. Or perhaps for a nefarious purpose? Either way, can't take him seriously.
Mathis has always given off weird vibes. I've always gotten the feeling he worked for someone to muddle the conspiracy waters and plant doubt. He certainly had his share of ego too.
In honor of Uncle Ted's passing, I post this to remind everyone that not everything is as we've been told:
The Unabomber was another Psy-op (25-page PDF)
If this comes as news, I hope that at least at this point it doesn't come as a surprise. The paper is by disinfo agent Miles Mathis, so all the usual caveats apply.
A couple of little factoids to add to the material in the paper are that Judy Clarke (of fake OJ trial fame) served as his lawyer, and Merrick Garland (of corrupt DOJ fame) oversaw the Unabom case as Deputy AG. What a coincidence!
The problem with Mathis is that with him almost every event of significance to humanity that he has examined is a highly orchestrated psyop done with the utmost care and precision. And every picture he examines has been doctored, though he's not sure how, but only very few talented people like him can tell. Even obscure pictures, that hardly anyone has even seen, the doctoring of which would have no effect on human history whatsoever. Masterfully doctored.
When he's right, he's right. But when he's wrong he just he can't admit it. Or he is just writing fiction for the hell of it. Or perhaps for a nefarious purpose? Either way, can't take him seriously.
Mathis has always given off weird vibes. I've always gotten the feeling he worked for someone to muddle the conspiracy waters and plant doubt. He certainly had his share of ego too.