Both can be true, yes. Significant can be a relative term. A significant amount of people died in the Vietnam war as well, but since not many died relative to the population of the country, not many people have close ties to the vets KIA.
I think if there was clear data showing that a significant percentage of people have died or been injured who have also been 2+ boosted, that would be a pretty cut and dry piece of evidence. That information is certainly out there, as we are constantly tracking mortality rates, and vaccination status.
If, of the people who have been double boosted, a >99% of the population had gotten no such major side effects or injuries, I would consider it safe for mass deployment.
Which means, of the estimated (supposedly) 5 billion people who have been vaccinated, 10s of millions may very well have gotten side effect and it still be 99% safe. But, that's the firm piece of data we still need
Well I don't know who these people are, or where the data is coming from yet. That doesn't mean I don't believe them, but I would want to see the information that backs that claim up. I've seen excess death data, but not in how it relates to those who have been vaccinated.
Both can be true, yes. Significant can be a relative term. A significant amount of people died in the Vietnam war as well, but since not many died relative to the population of the country, not many people have close ties to the vets KIA.
I think if there was clear data showing that a significant percentage of people have died or been injured who have also been 2+ boosted, that would be a pretty cut and dry piece of evidence. That information is certainly out there, as we are constantly tracking mortality rates, and vaccination status.
If, of the people who have been double boosted, a >99% of the population had gotten no such major side effects or injuries, I would consider it safe for mass deployment.
Which means, of the estimated (supposedly) 5 billion people who have been vaccinated, 10s of millions may very well have gotten side effect and it still be 99% safe. But, that's the firm piece of data we still need
Well I don't know who these people are, or where the data is coming from yet. That doesn't mean I don't believe them, but I would want to see the information that backs that claim up. I've seen excess death data, but not in how it relates to those who have been vaccinated.