Not being a "royal watcher" I had no idea this was a thing, that is, that Harry's wife likely faked her pregnancy. I only discovered in conversation with a fellow conspiracy theorist who is a woman, and thus her topics of interest are slightly different than mine..
There is plenty of evidence. We see it through a combination of pictures showing inconsistent belly size taken only days apart, as well as pictures that show her doing things quite difficult to do (if not impossible) for a pregnant woman, like squatting in high heels, and just the way her body looks in staged photos. Nobody who knows a real woman in her late 30s/early 40s has a belly that defies gravity like that.
Plenty of articles and videos offering evidence and "de-boooking" out there. But here is a good collection of pictures that tell the tale.
https://www.pinterest.nz/DuchessDisaster/harrys-wife-moonbumps-1-2-fakeancy/
One last thing. If it's ever proved the there was a surrogate, than this means the baby is ineligible for the thrown, even though it's way down the line. Apparently the rules are the baby must be born "from the body."
Pope Joan didn't exist, it was an urban myth of the middle ages. There is zero historical evidence for it, other than the story being repeated in a era where news went no faster than the fastest horse.