Correct, its not an argument. Its up to you to use your own inquistion to learn if you want.

Your previous argument was based on a source, citing trusted information. The point of the link i sent was that there is another who says your source of info is not true.

I couldnt convince you, i hardly have time talent or time it would take, if even possible. Its far better for you to change your own mind from your own learning and own experience.

This second argument is claiming that there is evidence for christ because modern man supposedly grasps as straws by faking that other mythology stories are the basis for christ story.

I dont bother with any moot arguments of why. I just look for the evidence of existance. A proof that jesus was real.

I see nothing