One good point he makes is that the Constitution is VOID FOR VAGUENESS.

A proper Constitution explicitly lays out laws and rules with no room for misinterpretation. In contractual law, a vague contract is tossed out by the court.

In criminal law, a law is void for vagueness if it does not specify what is required or what conduct is punishable.01 This is because an average citizen cannot generally determine what persons are regulated, what conduct is prohibited, or what punishment may be imposed. In American constitutional law, a statute is void for vagueness and unenforceable if it is too vague for the average citizen to understand. This is because constitutionally permissible activity may not be chilled because of a statute's vagueness, either because the statute is a penal statute with criminal or quasi-criminal civil penalties, or because the interest invaded by the vague law is sufficiently fundamental to subject the statute to strict scrutiny by a court determining its constitutionality.

The Constitution is so ambiguous and can be interpreted in too many ways and is full of Barnum statements.

Legal Tender laws are violations of the 9th and 10th amendments.