This is the guy, who removes flat earth documentaries and experiments, but promotes Big Foot and Yeti? :D
Can you find a more blurry picture next time, please? I think you can beat your previous record of stupid posts with a more blurry picture of a guy in a suit.
Question 1: How can this be a real picture when cameras focus on the center, while this one focuses on the trees on the sides?
Question 2: How can this be a real Yeti, when the "supposed Yeti" is clearly viewing the photographer and will catch up to him. Definitely in snow.
Question 3: I can do that same picture with little to no effort. Step 1: Get a big suit. Step 2: Make the camera out of focus on the suit. Step 3: Send it to you, so you can promote it here. :D Oh, right... it has to be a question: How do you know this is any reliable evidence?
Every time I click on your post it's 100% dumber than the dumbest thing I've shared. Gold material. Keep it up!
You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
And here you are defending big foot. What a transformation. :D I thought you are just too stupid to get flat earth, which is basically everyone, who failed physics. But dumb enough to buy into big foot? :D I guess that's your reward for acting like a dictator when evidence was presented to you on flat earth :( - you just silenced the topic. Now, you are buying into the most obvious nonsense that has only a single picture as evidence... :D
"If your enemy is on the wrong path - let them". Here, I will even upvote your answer. Go ahead with that theory. People like you will believe anything, but test nothing. :D
Hey, you can open a discussion on that topic and pin it. You are a mod after all. I am sure you struck gold with that yeti post. You can make it more public! Now, your yeti post stands at 3?! But you can use your mod privileges to pin it at the top. Why don't you open a discussion on the yeti problem? Here - free advice. And I won't even silence you if you disagree... Imagine that...
This is the guy, who removes flat earth documentaries and experiments, but promotes Big Foot and Yeti? :D
Can you find a more blurry picture next time, please? I think you can beat your previous record of stupid posts with a more blurry picture of a guy in a suit.
Question 1: How can this be a real picture when cameras focus on the center, while this one focuses on the trees on the sides?
Question 2: How can this be a real Yeti, when the "supposed Yeti" is clearly viewing the photographer and will catch up to him. Definitely in snow.
Question 3: I can do that same picture with little to no effort. Step 1: Get a big suit. Step 2: Make the camera out of focus on the suit. Step 3: Send it to you, so you can promote it here. :D Oh, right... it has to be a question: How do you know this is any reliable evidence?
Every time I click on your post it's 100% dumber than the dumbest thing I've shared. Gold material. Keep it up!
You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
And here you are defending big foot. What a transformation. :D I thought you are just too stupid to get flat earth, which is basically everyone, who failed physics. But dumb enough to buy into big foot? :D I guess that's your reward for acting like a dictator when evidence was presented to you on flat earth :( - you just silenced the topic. Now, you are buying into the most obvious nonsense that has only a single picture as evidence... :D
"If your enemy is on the wrong path - let them". Here, I will even upvote your answer. Go ahead with that theory. People like you will believe anything, but test nothing. :D
Hey, you can open a discussion on that topic and pin it. You are a mod after all. I am sure you struck gold with that yeti post. You can make it more public! Now, your yeti post stands at 3?! But you can use your mod privileges to pin it at the top. Why don't you open a discussion on the yeti problem? Here - free advice. And I won't even silence you if you disagree... Imagine that...