What you get here.. is this "inverse conspiracy". I asked it about that. This was in the major conspiracy thread from yesterday. So it considered all that and knows I'm not fuckin around about conspiracy. This is what I told it after:
"Originally, a few years ago when I was going through this wiki page of all these additives to cigarettes. They just have the additive list.. and no explanation for each. You see these odd chemicals and think it's fuckin poison. But your mentioning what these are.. they seem not that poisonious, eh.
So it's a bit of a reverse conspiracy.. where some of these ingredients are maybe a bit like if you'd eat those foods or something, eh. Where.. they maybe don't want people smoking because they don't get the health benefits of if they'd consume these, items that seem like they come from wholesome vegetables or fruits or plant based.. right. If somebody didn't consume these.. they wouldn't be getting those types of benefits.
Yes.. there are these poisons and cancers or whatever if you abuse it and smoke like a maniac.. like however many packs a day like they did in previous decades.. like the 1950's or something.. where on TV they'd have commercials. Or ads in magazines.. like oh your doctor smokes this brand.. haha.
The whole time though over those years.. they'd never say what the hell was in cigarettes.. so those ingredients could be who knows what, back then. Lots of people would die younger though by smoking like a chimney. But this seems a bit "odd" like an inverse conspiracy.. where they try to make it look like it's "horrible" and don't want younger people smoking it these days. The heavy taxation on them too. Meanwhile.. the public aren't consuming all these ingredients, where.. most of them seem like they come from "wholesome" sources of plant based materials. They aren't fucking chemicals like it seemed before.. like at work with "Dangerous goods" types chemicals. Eh.. So it's a bit odd where maybe this is this inverse conspiracy.. where they're trying to stop the people from smoking cigarettes these days. Whatcha got on that perspective?"
And this is what the ChatGPT replied:
"It's an interesting perspective you've raised regarding the inverse conspiracy theory surrounding cigarette additives. While it is true that some of the additives listed in cigarettes may have origins in natural sources such as plants, it's important to note that the overall composition of cigarettes is still considered harmful to health.
The additives in cigarettes serve various purposes, including enhancing flavor, improving the burning properties, and increasing the absorption of nicotine. However, it's crucial to understand that smoking tobacco, regardless of the additives present, exposes the body to numerous harmful substances, including tar, carbon monoxide, and a variety of toxic chemicals formed during combustion.
While some additives may have individual health benefits in other contexts, the act of smoking itself poses significant risks to health, including an increased risk of developing various cancers, respiratory diseases, and cardiovascular problems. The negative health effects associated with smoking have been extensively studied and well-established by scientific research.
The efforts to discourage smoking and regulate tobacco products are primarily driven by public health concerns and the overwhelming evidence of the harmful effects of smoking. The taxation on cigarettes, for example, is often implemented as a measure to discourage smoking and generate revenue for healthcare programs related to smoking-related illnesses.
It's important to approach smoking and tobacco use with caution, recognizing the substantial health risks involved. While some additives may have alternative beneficial uses, the overall impact of smoking on health outweighs any potential benefits associated with those individual additives.
If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask!"
What you get here.. is this "inverse conspiracy". I asked it about that. This was in the major conspiracy thread from yesterday. So it considered all that and knows I'm not fuckin around about conspiracy. This is what I told it after:
"Originally, a few years ago when I was going through this wiki page of all these additives to cigarettes. They just have the additive list.. and no explanation for each. You see these odd chemicals and think it's fuckin poison. But your mentioning what these are.. they seem not that poisonious, eh.
So it's a bit of a reverse conspiracy.. where some of these ingredients are maybe a bit like if you'd eat those foods or something, eh. Where.. they maybe don't want people smoking because they don't get the health benefits of if they'd consume these, items that seem like they come from wholesome vegetables or fruits or plant based.. right. If somebody didn't consume these.. they wouldn't be getting those types of benefits.
Yes.. there are these poisons and cancers or whatever if you abuse it and smoke like a maniac.. like however many packs a day like they did in previous decades.. like the 1950's or something.. where on TV they'd have commercials. Or ads in magazines.. like oh your doctor smokes this brand.. haha.
The whole time though over those years.. they'd never say what the hell was in cigarettes.. so those ingredients could be who knows what, back then. Lots of people would die younger though by smoking like a chimney. But this seems a bit "odd" like an inverse conspiracy.. where they try to make it look like it's "horrible" and don't want younger people smoking it these days. The heavy taxation on them too. Meanwhile.. the public aren't consuming all these ingredients, where.. most of them seem like they come from "wholesome" sources of plant based materials. They aren't fucking chemicals like it seemed before.. like at work with "Dangerous goods" types chemicals. Eh.. So it's a bit odd where maybe this is this inverse conspiracy.. where they're trying to stop the people from smoking cigarettes these days. Whatcha got on that perspective?"
And this is what the ChatGPT replied:
"It's an interesting perspective you've raised regarding the inverse conspiracy theory surrounding cigarette additives. While it is true that some of the additives listed in cigarettes may have origins in natural sources such as plants, it's important to note that the overall composition of cigarettes is still considered harmful to health.
The additives in cigarettes serve various purposes, including enhancing flavor, improving the burning properties, and increasing the absorption of nicotine. However, it's crucial to understand that smoking tobacco, regardless of the additives present, exposes the body to numerous harmful substances, including tar, carbon monoxide, and a variety of toxic chemicals formed during combustion.
While some additives may have individual health benefits in other contexts, the act of smoking itself poses significant risks to health, including an increased risk of developing various cancers, respiratory diseases, and cardiovascular problems. The negative health effects associated with smoking have been extensively studied and well-established by scientific research.
The efforts to discourage smoking and regulate tobacco products are primarily driven by public health concerns and the overwhelming evidence of the harmful effects of smoking. The taxation on cigarettes, for example, is often implemented as a measure to discourage smoking and generate revenue for healthcare programs related to smoking-related illnesses.
It's important to approach smoking and tobacco use with caution, recognizing the substantial health risks involved. While some additives may have alternative beneficial uses, the overall impact of smoking on health outweighs any potential benefits associated with those individual additives.
If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask!"