What are stars?
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
That would explain why they made pointing lasers at the night sky illegal. As if you have any chance of blinding a pilot 30k feet up in the air. They came down hard on anyone pointing lasers at the sky. There seems to be something up there they don't want you to notice. Maybe it's the top of our terrarium.
https://www.laserpointersafety.com/rules-general/uslaws/uslaws.html
Federal law says if you point a laser pointer in the sky it could be 5 years and $250,000 fine.
Which of these state what you claim?
Don't wanna click the link? I'll copy the text.
US: FDA/CDRH: 21 CFR 1040.10/11
The most important law covering U.S. lasers is 21 CFR 1040.10 and 1040.11. These cover laser products, and three uses of lasers (demonstrations, medical and surveying/alignment). The Food and Drug Administration's "Center for Devices and Radiological Health" issues regulations and reviews variances based on these laws. For more information, see the page at this website on U.S. regulatory agencies.
US: Illegal to aim laser pointer beams at aircraft or their flight path; up to 5 years in prison and up to $250,000 fine [The language below was signed into law by President Obama on February 14 2012. We are presenting it as it appears in the United States Code, which lists U.S. laws. The penalty for violating this law is up to 5 years in federal prison and/or up to a $250,000 fine.]
U.S.C. TITLE 18, CHAPTER 2
Sec. 39A. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft
(a) OFFENSE -- Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) LASER POINTER DEFINED -- As used in this section, the term `laser pointer' means any device designed or used to amplify electromagnetic radiation by stimulated emission that emits a beam designed to be used by the operator as a pointer or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item, or object.
(c) EXCEPTIONS -- This section does not prohibit aiming a beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft, or the flight path of such an aircraft, by--
(1) an authorized individual in the conduct of research and development or flight test operations conducted by an aircraft manufacturer, the Federal Aviation Administration, or any other person authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct such research and development or flight test operations;
(2) members or elements of the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security acting in an official capacity for the purpose of research, development, operations, testing or training; or
(3) by an individual using a laser emergency signaling device to send an emergency distress signal.
(d) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, may provide by regulation, after public notice and comment, such additional exceptions to this section, as may be necessary and appropriate. The Attorney General shall provide written notification of any proposed regulations under this section to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House and Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure in the House, and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in the Senate not less than 90 days before such regulations become final.
Yeah, thanks for disproving the claim I guess?
The claim was that it's illegal to point lasers at the sky. This is about pointing lasers at aircrafts.
Try again.
That's the same thing.
No, it's not. That's why they specify aircrafts
Unless you believe that the sky is made of aircrafts?
Flight paths. That's pretty much everywhere.
the sky an an aircraft are the same thing? Um ok, thanks for proving the drop in IQ is a real thing.
Got a source for that?
The law is in the code of federal regulations title 21, 1040.10 - 1040.11
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?FR=1040.10
and https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?FR=1040.11
Those are regulations about labeling on lasers.
Is this a fucking joke?
Don't trust any video with the comments turned off.
thats to avoid stupid people who think the sky and aircraft are the same thing, please go litter your trash elsewhere
I like the quote at the end
Most things you are told
Are far far from gold
Time to rethink them
before you are too old
So fucking dumb
How about you explain your model?
How large is the Earth? What's the sky? What's above around and beneath the Flat Earth?
Do you have illustrations with measurements?
So you cannot even explain anything about your model.
Not surprised
please explain how you measure things, and tell me the drop of a Flight from Fairbank Alaska to Lima Peru.
It's your model. You need to explain it but you can't. You don't even know how your flat eart is supposed to look like
No you can't. That's why you won't.
He's fallen into the "everything i hate is cause russian bots" trap. Its probably due to being morally bankrupt due to spending all his money on Only Fans in the hope he could touch a girl.
They're these things. It's why the light is reflected back in a seemingly erratic way:
https://www.tiktok.com/@informationstoree/video/7228490088349453595?lang=en
dirt simple to fake with a drone
make a video doing that, back up your claim plz... but I'm guessing you wont cause u think baseless claims are science. Where are you going to outsource this silent helicopter drone, do they sell them @Best Buy?
https://youtu.be/91gnkZGKGEY?t=591
haha, that laser drone had a range of like 50 feet plus the laser was static, in the video i posted the star was way further away and anything but static. But thanks for the low IQ comparison of apples or oranges.
sailboats dont go over the horizon, they are optically occulted by it through angular size change and the optical rising plane required to allow you to perceive depth in the first place comes to an end https://youtu.be/Wn0N5AJ8LUo