You will have to read some of Webster Tarpley's work to get the bigger picture on this one: https://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/how-the-dead-souls-of-venice-corrupted-science/
Tarpley's work focuses on how oligarchical families shaped events and were interested in long term projects to better shape the future minds of their slaves. He doesn't mention the Jews outright since he is an academic but knowing that the black nobility were Jewish solves the riddle.
Basically they promoted Newton over Leibniz because Leibniz had ideas that would ruin their control. I highly recommend you look up Leibniz and check his work,
Here you can see how the Israelis obtained Newton's manuscripts that had to do with his Jewish hallucinations regarding the Talmud and the Jewish temple. He was their man.
Nice one, thanks for this. I've recently been scanning though some of what Lyndon LaRouche wrote about this Newton v Leibniz thing.
Just found the article by LaRouche, I didn't know he wrote about it as well, I will give it a good read.
a) OL'IGRACHY, noun [Gr. few, and rule.]...if many ignore perceivable, then the suggestions of the few become the rule for the many.
b) flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life)...resistance allows life to shape; ignorance allows others to shape ones life.
c) event (inception) towards eclipse (death) represents horizon (inception towards death) for center (life)
a) ones consent to the suggestions of others; willing enslaves ones mind to the suggested, while allowing those suggesting mastery over suggested.
b) suggested progressivism tempts one to ignore that which is perceivable for suggestions about that which isn't (the future). One needs to resist (life) progress (inception towards death); while suggested progressivism tempts one to ignore resisting and instead follow along, hence establishing the leader/follower dynamic.
IDE'A, noun [Gr. to see]...perceivable (reality) ruins control over suggested (fiction)...unless ignored.
TALMUD (instruction) represents MISHNAH (perceivable) and GEMARA (suggested), hence helping those who choose perceivable to control those who choose suggested. The oral torah represents perceivable sound; while the written part represents suggested words...the difference has to be discerned by oneself.
As for pit and pedestal...those ignoring perceivable for suggested are willingly submitting to stand under (understanding) those suggesting, this establishes the pit of the many for the pedestal of the few. Those who comprehend this utilize others on the temporary pedestal (hence hidden hand), which for those who consent to take that position upon the pedestal; represents the catch-22; the deal with the devil; the Faustian bargain etc.
Pedestal (want) vs Pit (not want) represents talmudic reasoning within gemara (suggested), hence controllable from outside by those who discern self within mishnah (perceivable).
Furthermore; reading talmud as a book; either mishnah or gemara or both together, does not represent self discernment of partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), because a book (letters and words aka symbolism and spell-craft) represents a suggestion and reading it represents ones consent to suggested (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).
Bonus: the gemara part represents the foundation for gematria aka numerology aka tempting the individual unit (one) to count collective numbers (two; three; four etc.)...hence ignoring one-self.