Would the UN plotting and conspiring with countries to build a "NWO" be considered a criminal conspiracy? and if so, which agency would be able to investigate this for prosecution? So if I have witnesses who know about this plot/criminal conspiracy, which agency can I file report to open up an investigation into it and interview witnesses?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
If this is so, then there would be a criminal conspiracy spanning over more than 15 centuries.
The UN is only one step of the ever--evolving NWO.
It was called the Amorites.
It was called the Hyskos.
It was called the Vatican.
It was called the Bavarian Illuminati.
It was called the League of Nations.
And it is now called the United Nations.
It’s called the Jews lol those other things are just fronts of e Jews and not the real issue.
Then how come the Torah is the very antithesis of the NWO? This probably warrants its own thread but I want to start the discussion here. The Torah espouses traditional values, teaches people to love their neighbours as they do themselves, to free slaves every 50 years, it forbids usury. The illuminati (which includes many jews) are neophiles, have a complete disdain for humanity, want to lead the world into permanent slavery, and they use usury as their tool. My point is that NWO ideology seems to be something that has infiltrated Judaism, not something that originated with it. I suspect it happened during the diaspora, where most jews became so comfortable in Babylon that they didn't want to return to Israel after Cyrus reinstated the nation. In Daniel it's mentioned that a Babylonian religious mode was forced upon Jews. NWO ideology is really something that transmits from people to people. It was with the ancient Egyptians before that, and originally with Atlantis, which is the society that they want to reinstate. The jews are simply the people to whom that ideology got transmitted.
Dont lie. That only applies to Jewsish slaves, the goyim slaves can be held indefinitely.
We all know that the torah is for the public and that they live according to the talmud.
Leviticus 25:10 simply states that all inhabitants of Israel should be freed, not just Hebrews. In Exodus and Deutronomy it talks about Hebrews in particular, and says they should be freed every seven years, which could be an indication that that's a separate law. So Hebrews were freed every seven years, but everyone was freed every 50 years. This would make sense, since they were nationalists just like every other nation on earth. Nonetheless it's a form of humanitarianism, even though it's less commonly done toward foreigners than it is to Hebrews.
Sorry, I can't comment on the Talmud as I'm not knowledgeable about it. I thought it was formed over the first millennium and therefore irrelevant to our discussion (because I'm talking about Judaism during the time the Tanakh was formed and before that, i.e. how it was originally), but I just learnt that even academics believe the oral traditions originated before the diaspora. I did not expect that. If you have any resources on the Talmud, it's much appreciated.