A rebuttal of the idea that Satan is actually an alien...
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Right, "satan" is a just an adjective, but you have to flip your thinking around on the concept of "naming". These ancient aliens went by many names, but guess what? So do modern humans.
Take, for example, the modern human that ran for President against Trump in 2016. In one short human lifespan, you can probably think up two dozen different "names" by which she has been referred to: Hillary Rodham, Senator Clinton, First Lady of Arkansas, Hillbeast, HRC, Mrs. Clinton, Secretary Clinton, The Next President of the United States, Hellary, etc, etc. Think how flexible we need to be to track entities that live for millennia known by numerous cultures worldwide.
As to Satan's genealogy, think of the black hole that exists around it. We all just assumed that God created Satan for some reason, or perhaps that Satan always existed. The "authorities" just told us whatever was convenient to their argument at the the time, but mostly they ignored the evidence and were silent. How can that be considered "theology"?
The "scholars" decline to give an explanation of the evidence we have at hand. So not only do I demand such an explanation, I give one. What, then, shall we think of the "scholars" and "authorities"?
It turns out these is quite a strong, simple and precise connection between Masonry, Babylon, and Satan. To tell you, though, gives away some of the game, and your acceptance will be much stronger if you discover these things for yourself. Ask me about it later, if you're still wondering.
I still have yet to watch the Hancock/Biglino interview. I worry, though, that Biglino will be "turned". That very thing happened to Alan Alford. Better watch close to see if I start changing my tune!
Lucifer was indeed an El, but the Elohim are not human. Gen 1:1 was intentionally damaged, and put back together it reads, "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens and the Earth." (See Michal Ledwith for details.) So the Elohim Really, the function of the sentence is to establish clearly that the Elohim preexisted humans.
Later in Genesis, Man is created. With a correct understanding of "in our image", we find that that it was through genetic engineering. So properly understood, humans are some part Elohim. That explains why the Elohim can interbreed with humans. Also, it explains why the resulting Nephilim were giants. Hybrids, such as ligers, may lack the gene for regulating growth.
I feel like everything important that I've discovered has just been an accident, not any type of inspiration. One question that intrigues me just leads to another and to another and then it's like, "Whoa, check out this thing here!" It's the opposite of efficient but it does have a couple of benefits.
One is that it help prevent bias confirmation. I'm never looking for evidence of what I already think, I'm just looking for a good answer to my question. I find that's the opposite of what most everyone else does. They never pose questions to themselves, and they'll take as evidence anything that supports what they already think.
The other benefit is that by wandering around, you're exposed to more truths. There are no unimportant truths, just ones that are less interesting and less immediately relevant.
The idea is that truth is like a giant, smooth, flat bed sheet. There are no wrinkles, no holes, and every thread is eventually connected to every other. Knowing a variety of truths imposes a discipline which I notice others acutely lack. That is, if you come across some truth that seems to contradict some other truth you already know, one or both have to give. The result flattens that wrinkle or mends that tear.
Like, did you ever notice that someone who disagrees with you on social media calls you a dumbshit by the second post, if not right in the first? That's strong evidence of how very little truth they know. Otherwise, why not bring it forward to iron it out between the two of you? Sad commentary on how much people know about the world.
Anyway, as to the last thing you said, it's not quite what you describe but I would definitely recommend to anyone that to properly process information they're taking on board, they have to let their mind wander and not be continuously "consuming". I can't tell you the number of times I've been taking a walk listening to a boring podcast when my mind starts to wander and... bam, I come to some realization about something that had been cooking in the back of my mind.
I don't go out of my way to fast-forward or skip boring episodes of podcasts for just that reason.