On the other hand, it's yet another thing that establishes pretty concretely that the government was involved in the attack, which is important regardless. Someone who hasn't investigated yet will think the CIA recruited people for the actual attacks. The wider context is that they recruited people for a psy-op / cover story, which was essential for the destruction of the towers, and of course to brainwash the world. So it's damning either way. It's somewhat similar to the idea that Sars-cov-2 was developed in a lab. The criminal part was that people were terrorized based on highly inflated death counts, that so many people were killed through a panic-based medical response, that lockdowns were implemented, that save and effective medicines were suppressed, etc. But that's no reason to shoot down the message of development inside a lab, because it still conveys the essential message that governments are terrorizing the public deliberately. If the government is pointed out as the culprit, it will be up to them to undo their own terrorism. Perhaps if enough people are outraged, they will feel pressured to calm people by being more honest about how much damage was actually done. In the case of 9/11 that would mean explaining that it wasn't quite 3000 people who died that day. The timing is off now. But for future events, if enough people see through it quickly enough and direct their anger toward their own governments, it can effectively sabotage the operation, suddenly it becomes something they have to downplay rather than exaggerate.
More to stick more closely to the subject of 9/11 and this information being put out now: it can still stimulate people to look up more information about this topic and go down the rabbit hole, so it functions as a gateway to the full truth.
On the other hand, it's yet another thing that establishes pretty concretely that the government was involved in the attack, which is important regardless. Someone who hasn't investigated yet will think the CIA recruited people for the actual attacks. The wider context is that they recruited people for a psy-op / cover story, which was essential for the destruction of the towers, and of course to brainwash the world. So it's damning either way. It's somewhat similar to the idea that Sars-cov-2 was developed in a lab. The criminal part was that people were terrorized based on highly inflated death counts, that so many people were killed through a panic-based medical response, that lockdowns were implemented, that save and effective medicines were suppressed, etc. But that's no reason to shoot down the message of development inside a lab, because it still conveys the essential message that governments are terrorizing the public deliberately. If the government is pointed out as the culprit, it will be up to them to undo their own terrorism. Perhaps if enough people are outraged, they will feel pressured to calm people by being more honest about how much damage was actually done. In the case of 9/11 that would mean explaining that it wasn't quite 3000 people who died that day. The timing is off now. But for future events, if enough people see through it quickly enough and direct their anger toward their own governments, it can effectively sabotage the operation, suddenly it becomes something they have to downplay rather than exaggerate.
More to stick more closely to the subject of 9/11 and this information being put out now: it can still stimulate people to look up more information about this topic and go down the rabbit hole, so it functions as a gateway to the full truth.