I'm in the service and we had a speech, once the commander started bringing up Hate russia, hate putin, i immediately just ignored the rest of the speech. Why they do this propaganda. Should i be hating russia or ukraine?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
There's no "implication" here, in the military you have a commanding Officer, you do consent to obey his commands, and they are NOT suggestions!
Seriously, of all the things you could possibly write to further the oft-stated notion that you're an absolute idiot, this might be the strongest evidence yet.
responding just encourages the bot
How does one get into it? Recruitment aka ones consent to the suggestion of another. What keeps one within it? Consenting to serve suggested commands. If one resists, then one gets discharged (to free from any load or burden). Ones consent burdens one with the suggestions by others, hence piling up until a violent release, which others can direct with their suggested commands.
Fighting others wastes ones resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)...others exploit ones lack of resistance by suggesting one to fight.
The suggestions of others posses the ones consenting to them. Ask any VET'ERAN, adjective [Latin veteranus, from vetero, to grow old, from vetus, old.] if they still posses youth or if fighting others helped them to hold onto youth?
Consider if the few utilize suggestions to posses the consenting many, which then allows the few to exorcise all the possessions of the many right out of them?
a) "sir yes sir" implies ones agreement to obey suggested commands by others, and soldiers are being domesticated by frequency of repetition into compliance, hence grinding down their resistance until they represent a regiment (a mind that moves in a straight line) aka order followers aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka uniformity aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
b) OBEY, verb - " [Latin obedio] - "to submit to direction of"...if life submits to direction (inception towards death), then life dies quicker. Life represents the resistance within direction....others suggest the inversion thereof as "progressivism".
Any stated suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable notion. One represents the temporary state (growth) within ongoing notion (loss), hence ones struggle to sustain self.
How can an absolute be peculiar to one's partial self?