'unjected' platform for unvaxed community gets taken down by their own web developer, allegedly. they claim they gave him the keys to the site, he didn't do his job, they tried to get rid of him and probably strip the ownership stock percentage they offered him, he takes the site down.
my question is how retarded are the owners or the site to even allow this to be possible. the site had been hacked within the last couple years, profiles mocked on mass media, probably a fed honeypot like everything else.
are the owners malicious, or just retards who didn't have any web development skills and even lacked relationships with web developers they actually knew personally and trusted enough to hire, and instead hire someone who doesn't even live in their own country?
In January 2022, in light of rapid development needs, Unjected hired Oystein Kirknes, owner of Xenzia AS out of Norway to upgrade and maintain the Unjected site.
In exchange for his service, he was given stake in the company. After over a year of dropping the ball on key issues and failing to deliver on his promises, he was fired from Unjected.
Unfortunately, he has refused to step away with dignity and has, instead, chosen to lock the rightful owners out and has captured the payment processing service, effectively eliminating the means of revenue for the company.
https://unjected.substack.com/p/news-release-official-statement-from
I think probably no one anywhere knows the depths of the infiltration and subversion, both in tech and everywhere else. In tech it's everything from Spamhaus and Cloudflare to boot microcode in factory-fresh hard drives.
Just a few days ago, Jim Stone mentioned he got hacked so hard once he heard the hard drive spinning after the power was off. He had to yank the cord from the wall.
The reason I say it's unknown is that, from the inside, it's so widespread no one could keep track. Plus, compartmentalization demands that everyone only know what they need to know.
From the outside, it's unknowable in principle. That is, they keep everything on the up-and-up until such time as action is deemed necessary. Until then, you can't detect that which has no manifestation.
While it's not in tech, the recent departure of James O'Keefe provided a glimpse into the depths. I followed the story as reported by the No Agenda Show podcast. What I will say next is predicated on O'Keefe being legitimate, so read no further if you disagree because it will gain you no insight.
One of the listeners contacted host Adam Curry about the story. He is the CEO of one of the foundations, and said that the board of directors was totally legit, yada yada. Remember that this is going out to an audience probably approaching a million.
My read is that no, the board was not legit and O'Keefe was corralled. When he finally went over the line they drove him out and discredited him. But as part of the coverup of that action, this CEO pumps out disinfo through No Agenda. Adam seems to suspect none of this, rather he buys in because he's getting it from an "inside source". Which is true, but he doesn't suspect that the inside is contaminated.
I also recall when a couple of listeners to the podcast wrote in with notes on their donations about their friends or relatives that had been killed in the LV "massacre". I think few suspect the rot goes so deep as to monitor and use podcasts in this way, even with legitimate hosts.