I have to say I think analysis of this event as evidence that Tucker is "controlled opposition" is brainless. I would pose the question, "Just when and where is evidence of this 'control' manifesting?"

That is, if "They" control Tucker, why precisely would he be allowed to speak negatively about vaxxs in the first place, other than, of course, to ultimately divert or disguise the truth? I see that no one bothers to present such analysis. So many are to engaged declaring how they were "right all along" to actually carefully reason.

One could say that the real truth is that all vaxxes are phony because viruses do not exist in the way we have been told. True enough. But ask yourself if the people that are still watching Fox News are ready for the whole "viruses don't exist" presentation. Not in my opinion.

Finally, it's not that I think he says everything he knows to everyone who will listen, but there's about 0% of people who do that. I've never actually watched his show because I find his delivery very annoying.