Before Q there was WhiteHouseAnon
(archive.is)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
I am still baffled how millions fell for the Q bullshit and basically constructed a religion around it.
I caught onto it late, being all the way over in Scotland and all but I bought into it for about 3 or so months. Only became aware of it just before the American election. It was clear that massive corruption was running our world anyway but that it somehow ramped up or became more noticeable after Brexit and Trump. Like, things just seemed weird.
I occasionally watched a YouTuber called Lonnel Harris who passively mentioned it ( he said “maybe those Q folks were right” or something along those lines) which prompted me to look into what he was talking about.
Anyway after reading and researching (or, rather, looking at other peoples research) I thought crikey - so THAT’S why there’s all this desperate insanity and I believed it and looked forward to it. I started talking to my boss in work who is also my friend and it caused us to fall out. I told my other friends that there were children being saved from tunnels. I said there would be televised tribunals. I joined GAW but I was never into the language they used such as calling each other ‘fren’ and suchlike (thankfully I could see the cultishness of the ‘community’ pretty much straight away) Yikes. I realised fairly soon that one of the main points of Q was to estrange people from each other - just like wokery. Then I learned about Cass Sunstein and Nudge Units, then I learned a little more about Trump and who he is REALLY loyal to. Then I had another sober look at the vile things Trump said about his own daughter. Fall Cabal was a good series with good eye opening information, even if the makers of the programme were a bit out there and passing off fake photographs.
Reading the Q drops I started noticing things conspicuous by their absence and questionable phrases. Then I saw that others thought the whole thing was a sham and I gave it up like a bad habit.
For a few months though it seemed exciting and hopeful that the corruption of the world was coming to an end.
I remember being in GAW, which I’ve been booted from numerous times and am banned forever from now, and raising reasonable questions only to be confronted with an undeniable cultish shepherding behaviour.
One of the mods legitimately thinks that Q is Jesus returned in computer form via ‘quantum echoes’ for instance.
Thing is, those people are far, faaaar too invested in Q to ever take a sober and critical look at the myriad questions concerning Trump and Q.
There are people who seen it for what it was from the jump, there are those who boughtt into it at first but just couldn’t continue a delusion in the face of overwhelming contradictory evidence and there are those who incorporate it into their very identity and adopt it as a faith, despite everything. The latter group are to be pitied as their heart is in the right place. Their brain is up their arse though and they end up defending obvious charlatans and evildoers.
Q tardism is a mental disorder
People are stupid and desperate to feel like they belong to a community?
a) if you resist judging others (stupid and desperate), then you may see the connection between those who want to belong to a commune-ity and those who suggest commune-ism...
b) what if feelings aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] tempts one to ignore being (life) moved by (inception towards death)? Could falling for emotions allow others to direct one through suggestions?
In other words...setting up a predictable reaction by mentally and psychically poking others, while exploiting their clouded state of mind when reacting under the influence of emotions. For example in boxing it's called taunting, and when the few are getting away with taunting the many, then they call it chutzpah.
Run your shtick by someone who cares -- your posts have really never interested me.
GIMMICK aka MMIGICK (magic)
About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0)
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies choice (consent of the many) to choice (suggestions of the few) contract law, which represents the inversion of being choice (perceiving) within balance (perceivable).
In short...ignoring the base (perceivable) gives others the power of ones consent to construct (suggested).
If one consent to suggested, while ignoring perceivable, then perceivable (reality) will baffle (elude) the minds of those viewing it through the lens of suggested (fiction).