a) latitude (temporary growth within ongoing loss) within longitude (inception towards death) represents geometry of "ones" life. Suggested dualism (two) distracts one from self.
b) measurement implies ones mind (ment) measuring (perceiving) measurable (perceivable)...the suggestions by others tempt one to ignore that.
the chosen mathematical formulas for identifying
a) suggested IDEN'TIFY, verb [Latin idem, the same, and facio, to make.] tempts one to ignore that nature differentiates itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving).
b) formula aka form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). A suggested formula represents the ceremony; ritual to shape the form of those consenting to follow suggested in-form-ation, instead of adapting to in-spir(it)-ation.
c) suggested MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath" tempts one to count from zero, hence suffering the aftermath of ones choices. The perceivable (science) of quantity is based on designation of UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole).
location
Aka LOCOS (placement aka place of mind) -TION (through action)...mind (choice) exists within the momentum (balance) of motion, hence as partial reaction (living) within enacting whole (process of dying).
The few suggest math based on zero aka on mass consent to an affixed point to count from, which tempts those who consent to ignore being within the momentum of ongoing motion, hence in need to balance as choice.
In other words...suggested problems tempts one to ignore perceivable solution, which corrupts ones self discernment about being temporary problem (living) within ongoing solution (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self.
a) latitude (temporary growth within ongoing loss) within longitude (inception towards death) represents geometry of "ones" life. Suggested dualism (two) distracts one from self.
b) measurement implies ones mind (ment) measuring (perceiving) measurable (perceivable)...the suggestions by others tempt one to ignore that.
a) suggested IDEN'TIFY, verb [Latin idem, the same, and facio, to make.] tempts one to ignore that nature differentiates itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving).
b) formula aka form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). A suggested formula represents the ceremony; ritual to shape the form of those consenting to follow suggested in-form-ation, instead of adapting to in-spir(it)-ation.
c) suggested MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath" tempts one to count from zero, hence suffering the aftermath of ones choices. The perceivable (science) of quantity is based on designation of UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole).
Aka LOCOS (placement aka place of mind) -TION (through action)...mind (choice) exists within the momentum (balance) of motion, hence as partial reaction (living) within enacting whole (process of dying).
The few suggest math based on zero aka on mass consent to an affixed point to count from, which tempts those who consent to ignore being within the momentum of ongoing motion, hence in need to balance as choice.
In other words...suggested problems tempts one to ignore perceivable solution, which corrupts ones self discernment about being temporary problem (living) within ongoing solution (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self.