Do you avoid sunlight? Own a microwave? Have electric motors? You are surrounded by electromagnetic radiation whether you like it or not. Your body can handle it.
If you get a chance read The Body Electric by, I think it's Bender. He's a bone doctor and researcher-- he developed a way to help bad breaks heal with electric signals which is widely used today. The problem is not the thermal effects or the radiation itself- the problem is that the body uses a lot of electrical signalling internally, and a lot of the effects relate to frequency and resonance more than just intensity, and it is not well understood. Since it is not well understood and a lot of money is at stake, it is even less well understood-- business agendas come into play, and the science becomes an economic battlefield.
a) emission implies as form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence center expression of impressing surrounding.
b) notice that to "direct sequences", the Wi-Fi has to be wired to a source, hence utilizing surrounding as source to emit directed sequences from its center outwards.
c) why is it called Wireless (Wi) Fidelity (Fi)? Because it requires ones consent aka ones FIDEL'ITY, noun (Latin fidelitas, fides, faith, fido, to trust.] - "faith; faithfulness" to ignore the perceivable wire for suggested wireless.
Ones consent to a suggestion by others implies SEQUENCE (following) DIRECTION (towards suggested outcomes aka progressivism)...this represents the inversion of being DISARRAY (life) within DIRECTION (inception towards death), hence needing to resist, while wanting to follow.
If I can ever get my shit going with my empire of companies.. we'll see if we can get goggles you put on where it's like FLIR with the heat.. and you can see this wi-fi shit.. people won't fall for that probably bad shit. lol.
GOG'GLE, verb (Latin celo) - "to strain eyes" + STRAIN, verb - "to stretch; to draw with force; to extend with great effort".
Aren't goggles suggested to reduce strain on ones eyes? Doesn't seeing without "spectacles" takes a much greater effort than with? If a spectator implies a beholder (holding onto being), then what if being (living) represents the need to let go (process of dying), while struggling with the want to hold onto?
What if others utilize suggestion to tempt one to ignore required efforts within perceivable?
Do you avoid sunlight? Own a microwave? Have electric motors? You are surrounded by electromagnetic radiation whether you like it or not. Your body can handle it.
If you get a chance read The Body Electric by, I think it's Bender. He's a bone doctor and researcher-- he developed a way to help bad breaks heal with electric signals which is widely used today. The problem is not the thermal effects or the radiation itself- the problem is that the body uses a lot of electrical signalling internally, and a lot of the effects relate to frequency and resonance more than just intensity, and it is not well understood. Since it is not well understood and a lot of money is at stake, it is even less well understood-- business agendas come into play, and the science becomes an economic battlefield.
Sunlight doesn't cause cancer, get that shit outta here
I don't think so.. i'll avoid any of this bad wifi shit and just plug a damn cable. lol
a) emission implies as form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence center expression of impressing surrounding.
b) notice that to "direct sequences", the Wi-Fi has to be wired to a source, hence utilizing surrounding as source to emit directed sequences from its center outwards.
c) why is it called Wireless (Wi) Fidelity (Fi)? Because it requires ones consent aka ones FIDEL'ITY, noun (Latin fidelitas, fides, faith, fido, to trust.] - "faith; faithfulness" to ignore the perceivable wire for suggested wireless.
Ones consent to a suggestion by others implies SEQUENCE (following) DIRECTION (towards suggested outcomes aka progressivism)...this represents the inversion of being DISARRAY (life) within DIRECTION (inception towards death), hence needing to resist, while wanting to follow.
Here's it looping there..
https://imgur.com/YQvfxul
If I can ever get my shit going with my empire of companies.. we'll see if we can get goggles you put on where it's like FLIR with the heat.. and you can see this wi-fi shit.. people won't fall for that probably bad shit. lol.
Aren't goggles suggested to reduce strain on ones eyes? Doesn't seeing without "spectacles" takes a much greater effort than with? If a spectator implies a beholder (holding onto being), then what if being (living) represents the need to let go (process of dying), while struggling with the want to hold onto?
What if others utilize suggestion to tempt one to ignore required efforts within perceivable?