People say Jews are at the top but it’s actually the Babylonians who migrated to Rome or become the Roman Empire. Many of them claim to be Catholic but are lying. The Dark Zionists who claim to be Jews are lying too. They are also Satanists. The wailing wall is the Roman Wall. When the Romans destroyed the 2nd Temple, they left their own wall up as a sign. Now they demand all pay homage to it.
People say jews are at the top but it’s actually the Babylonians
What if ones consent to suggested labels (jews; babylonians) implies "standing under" those suggesting, hence putting others at the top by willingly putting self at the bottom?
claim to be
a) what if one first has to be before being able to suggest a claim to others?
b) what if the few aren't claiming (seek to obtain), but simply gain whatever the many lose by wanting to hold onto?
are lying
a) without the many holding onto truth; how could the lies of the few reach them?
b) are the few inside the true vs false conflict of reason or are they defining; redefining and contradicting what the many are reasoning about, while controlling both sides of every conflict?
They are also Satanists
a) if an -IST (satanist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (satanism); then who suggests the few to consent?
b) does the behavior of the few represent order following or do the few suggest the many to follow orders, which in return allows the few to direct the many?
The wailing wall is the Roman Wall
What if the few WAIL (lament; regret) the WALL (ignorance of perceivable for suggested) within the minds/memory of the many?
People say Jews are at the top but it’s actually the Babylonians who migrated to Rome or become the Roman Empire. Many of them claim to be Catholic but are lying. The Dark Zionists who claim to be Jews are lying too. They are also Satanists. The wailing wall is the Roman Wall. When the Romans destroyed the 2nd Temple, they left their own wall up as a sign. Now they demand all pay homage to it.
What if ones consent to suggested labels (jews; babylonians) implies "standing under" those suggesting, hence putting others at the top by willingly putting self at the bottom?
a) what if one first has to be before being able to suggest a claim to others?
b) what if the few aren't claiming (seek to obtain), but simply gain whatever the many lose by wanting to hold onto?
a) without the many holding onto truth; how could the lies of the few reach them?
b) are the few inside the true vs false conflict of reason or are they defining; redefining and contradicting what the many are reasoning about, while controlling both sides of every conflict?
a) if an -IST (satanist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (satanism); then who suggests the few to consent?
b) does the behavior of the few represent order following or do the few suggest the many to follow orders, which in return allows the few to direct the many?
What if the few WAIL (lament; regret) the WALL (ignorance of perceivable for suggested) within the minds/memory of the many?
Sleight of hand:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGWQqRyO8gA (Serj Tankian was born in Beirut; Lebanon; grandparents were survivors of the Armenian genocide...)
So what?