There's a theory floating around that takes the same observations described in the article and accounts for them in a different way. It's one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard and I've never researched it in depth because I don't really like thinking about it, but here it is....
The Anunnaki and their offspring, the Nephilim, were cannibalistic. That is, they ate humans, and humans are genetically part-Anunnaki and part-primate. So many of the old stories of human sacrifice may not have been for strictly ceremonial purposes, or even for consumption of loosh, but for consumption of human flesh.
At some point and in some circumstance of which I do not know, a compromise or substitute was developed. Through genetic engineering, wild hogs were crossed with humans to create domestic pigs. The Anunnaki or Nephilim could eat these freely without people getting upset at all the human sacrifice and cannibalism.
As crazy as this thesis sounds, it precisely addresses two very disparate items:
First, the paper suggest the cross was due to some fucking in the forest by wild pigs and primates. Does that seem even remotely plausible? Not to me. Interestingly, Robert Sepehr has mentioned some hybrid primates that are not much different from either parent species, but are socially rejected by both.
Second, did you ever wonder where the Jews' very strong taboo against pork came from? People wave their hands around about parasites and trichonosis or whatever, but others have been safely consuming pork for a very long time. I'm pretty sure that if there was a safe way to do it, hungry people would find it.
If any of this has put anyone off pork to any extent, I'm staring a club.
I theorized it might have universal appeal, so I looked for a long time before I finally ran across someone that hated the smell of bacon cooking. Maybe there are more advanced beings among us who "get it" on a much deeper level?
There's a theory floating around that takes the same observations described in the article and accounts for them in a different way. It's one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard and I've never researched it in depth because I don't really like thinking about it, but here it is....
The Anunnaki and their offspring, the Nephilim, were cannibalistic. That is, they ate humans, and humans are genetically part-Anunnaki and part-primate. So many of the old stories of human sacrifice may not have been for strictly ceremonial purposes, or even for consumption of loosh, but for consumption of human flesh.
At some point and in some circumstance of which I do not know, a compromise or substitute was developed. Through genetic engineering, wild hogs were crossed with humans to create domestic pigs. The Anunnaki or Nephilim could eat these freely without people getting upset at all the human sacrifice and cannibalism.
As crazy as this thesis sounds, it precisely addresses two very disparate items:
First, the paper suggest the cross was due to some fucking in the forest by wild pigs and primates. Does that seem even remotely plausible? Not to me. Interestingly, Robert Sepehr has mentioned some hybrid primates that are not much different from either parent species, but are socially rejected by both.
Second, did you ever wonder where the Jews' very strong taboo against pork came from? People wave their hands around about parasites and trichonosis or whatever, but others have been safely consuming pork for a very long time. I'm pretty sure that if there was a safe way to do it, hungry people would find it.
If any of this has put anyone off pork to any extent, I'm staring a club.
Reminds me of the beginning of 2001 A Space Odyssey.
So, bacon is ok, right?
I theorized it might have universal appeal, so I looked for a long time before I finally ran across someone that hated the smell of bacon cooking. Maybe there are more advanced beings among us who "get it" on a much deeper level?