Since when did this occur?
(www.bbc.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
I wish I could talk properly to you but you are unable to form coherent sentences.
No you are. You're dumber than a sack of shit.
You attacked me first. You mouth stupid little things. All you have done is mouth stupid little things.
You accuse me of not reading. No you haven't. You haven't even processed.
Again really simple. There is no science. None. This is data. How was that data acquired. An average or estimate. It isn't accurate if it's a projection. That data hasn't even quantified impotency.
Read it. What does it say, couples having non protected intercourse in a year. What the fuck does that even mean. They're diagnosed. No.
It's pure apeshit.
Go back to retard school. Come back with proper figures. They simply do not correlate into other data Googled or otherwise or as credible.
Are you impotent. Come on let's do this poll? There are six in here. 1 of us is right. Look we probaby have that answer. Trust the science?
In the words of Shakespeare, You impotent fool. King Lear? Perhaps
It's data interpreted by scientists you moron.
It's not data by scientists. It's data by a computer. The same software doing COVID infections. Has produced an estimate that has no scientific basis. The science being a medical diagnosis.
Or answer me why you're an impotent fool? You're telling me to trust the science. I don't trust the data. Clearly it's because you're impotent?
Would you like to talk about it? Were you born impotent, or did it develop later in life? When did you notice your impotency? Now your account name makes sense.
The data is interpreted by scientists you fucking cretin. Scientists wrote the study. Otherwise it would just be a bunch of numbers.
You really are too fucking uneducated to understand that. Go and get an education.