a) suggested (meat) represents the temptation within perceivable (hunger).

b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents the vector to make temptation poisonous.

c) resisting (need) temptation (want) represents ones free will of choice.

i'm actually terrified of this

a) one represents reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable), hence the potential effect (reaction) within the actual cause (action).

b) your consent to suggested terrorism tempts you to be afraid of suggested outcomes, while ignoring the need to for your to resist perceivable origin.

c) both fear (not want) and hope (want) are aimed at suggested outcomes, which tempt one to ignore being in-between origin (inception) and outcome (death), hence still alive and kicking (resisting).

d) where did you came out of...suggested or perceivable? If you write "I'm...of this", then how could others define what "this" is when both of you still exist within it?

There is a good (~100%) chance

a) if good represents 100%, then bad doesn't exist...are you "actually" afraid or just ignorant of self imposed contradictions?

b) CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...what if one represents the effect (perceiving) within a known cause (perceivable)? What if self discernment of being effect (living) within cause (process of dying) has to be grown to comprehend that, and what if others can tempt one to ignore growth with suggested "chances" for already grown?

c) how many have to take a chance at gambling for you to realize that the few suggest gambling, because chance (effect of an unknown cause) cannot be, since being implies as effect within known cause?